Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Difference of Ability to Ask, Scientific Attitude, Motivation Before and After Following Contextual Teaching and Learning Model

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017) · hlm. 248–256

DOI
10.15294/jpe.v6i3.21097
ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Terbit
2017-12-01
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The learning model used by teachers in the classroom based on the result of the researcher's initial observation is still conventional, the student's inquiring ability is low, the students' scientific attitude is not maximal and the student's motivation is low. Teachers need to use innovative learning models that are suitable and are PAIKEM. The purpose of this study is to know and analyze the ability to ask, scientific attitude, and motivation of students before and after following the model of learning CTL. The research method is quasi experimental quantitative with one group pretest and posttest design technique. Techniques and instruments of data collection is an observation technique with questioning ability observation instrument and psychometric scale measurement of scientific attitude and psychology scale of student motivation. Data analysis technique using non parametric statistical test. The results showed that the ability to ask students before and after follow the model of learning CTL is not experiencing a significant positive difference whereas scientific attitude and student motivation experienced a significant positive difference. This is reinforced by the results of hypothesis test 1 that is not accepted because the value of α = 0, 066 above the value of α = 5%. In addition, the results of hypothesis 2 and 3 are α values below α = 5%.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 86 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 7 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Darul Ulum Islamic University
  • Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yuli Kurniawati Sugiyo PranotoState University of Semarang3
Aisyah Durrotun NafisahState University of Semarang2
Sunawan SunawanState University of Semarang2
Sinta SaraswatiState University of Semarang2
Mungin Eddy WibowoState University of Semarang2
Samsudi SamsudiState University of Semarang2
Bayu Tri PrasojoState University of Semarang1
Jianzhong J HongAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu KuncoroState University of Semarang1
Dwi Yuwono Puji SugihartoState University of Semarang1
Wahyu HardyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cheristiyanto CheristiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Achmad SlametState University of Semarang1
Joko WidodoState University of Semarang1
Ifada Retno EkaningrumUniversitas Wahid Hasyim1
Wasino WasinoState University of Semarang1
Wahyu LestariState University of Semarang1
Khatmirul AzizState University of Semarang1
Sukirman SukirmanState University of Semarang1
Muhamad Albir DamaraState University of Semarang1
DYP SugihartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anwar SutoyoState University of Semarang1
Muslikah MuslikahState University of Semarang1
Sri PujiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zumrotul HasanahState University of Semarang1
Duwi SitoresmiState University of Semarang1
Awalya AwalyaState University of Semarang1
Lyanna Oktavia TState University of Semarang1
Mela Elfida PutriState University of Semarang1
Imas MaspupatunAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad MunirDarul Ulum Islamic University1
Mulawarman MulawarmanState University of Semarang1
Angga Yuda MeilandaUniversitas Borneo Tarakan1
Farid AhmadiState University of Semarang1
Trisyagil TrisyagilState University of Semarang1
Ahmad SyukronState University of Semarang1
Aufa AshfahaniState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Difference of Ability to Ask, Scientific Attitude, Motivation Before and After Following Contextual Teaching and Learning Model</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Anggraeni, Tika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sugiyo, Sugiyo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kustiono, Kustiono</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The learning model used by teachers in the classroom based on the result of the researcher's initial observation is still conventional, the student's inquiring ability is low, the students' scientific attitude is not maximal and the student's motivation is low. Teachers need to use innovative learning models that are suitable and are PAIKEM. The purpose of this study is to know and analyze the ability to ask, scientific attitude, and motivation of students before and after following the model of learning CTL. The research method is quasi experimental quantitative with one group pretest and posttest design technique. Techniques and instruments of data collection is an observation technique with questioning ability observation instrument and psychometric scale measurement of scientific attitude and psychology scale of student motivation. Data analysis technique using non parametric statistical test. The results showed that the ability to ask students before and after follow the model of learning CTL is not experiencing a significant positive difference whereas scientific attitude and student motivation experienced a significant positive difference. This is reinforced by the results of hypothesis test 1 that is not accepted because the value of α = 0, 066 above the value of α = 5%. In addition, the results of hypothesis 2 and 3 are α values below α = 5%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-12-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/21097</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpe.v6i3.21097</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 6 No 3 (2017): December 2017; 248-256</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpe.v6i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/21097/10023</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>