Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Interaction of Learning Model and Learning Style in Improving Students Learning Outcomes

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 5 (2019) · hlm. 206–216

ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Terbit
2019-07-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purpose of this study was to determine the interaction between learning models (problem-based learning and inquiry-based learning) and learning styles in improving students learning outcomes (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor). The research method applied in this study was quantitative descriptive by using data analysis techniques of validity test, reliability test, difficulty level test, normality test, homogeneity test, and two-way ANOVA test. The data collection techniques used were tests in the form of descriptive questions, and non-tests in the form of cooperative attitude observation sheets, and student learning style questionnaire sheets. The subjects in this study were 48 students who were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 24 students using the problem-based learning model, and the second group consisted of 24 students using the inquiry-based learning model. The results of the study showed that: There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles in improving the learning outcomes in the cognitive and affective domains. There is no interaction between learning models and learning styles in improving psychomotor domains. The learning model of inquiry-based learning was more effective to be used in the learning than the problem-based learning models in improving student learning outcomes (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor) in the class with heterogeneous student learning styles (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic).

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 70 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 2 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Lamongan
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ibnu SodiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Yuli UtantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ufi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suyahmo SuyahmoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Masrukhi MasrukhiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dewi Liesnoor SetyowatiState University of Semarang2
Fakhruddin FakhruddinUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Ahmed Yogie NurwahidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nanda MerriandaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atno AtnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ba'in Ba'inAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ferria AndaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri RadityoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurahman KhubaibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti NurjanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
YYFR SunarjanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Febrianan KhaerunnisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novianan AfiqohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
DYP SugihartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alex SujantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tri Marhaeni Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adhila Ayu PuruhitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maman RachmanState University of Semarang1
Agitha Gaun Cakrapramesta NasaraniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Babul BahrudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iva KrisnaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika PrajantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Astuti AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tri Marhaeni Pudji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Frahasini FrahasiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Joko PrasetyoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Eko HandoyoUniversitas Muhammadiyah Lamongan1
Subagyo SubagyoState University of Semarang1
Nisa KusumaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Purwadi SuhandiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Irma SofiasyariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nahrul FaidinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Interaction of Learning Model and Learning Style in Improving Students Learning Outcomes</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Oktari, Senny Widia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Atmaja, Hamdan Tri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rifai RC, Achmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to determine the interaction between learning models (problem-based learning and inquiry-based learning) and learning styles in improving students learning outcomes (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor). The research method applied in this study was quantitative descriptive by using data analysis techniques of validity test, reliability test, difficulty level test, normality test, homogeneity test, and two-way ANOVA test. The data collection techniques used were tests in the form of descriptive questions, and non-tests in the form of cooperative attitude observation sheets, and student learning style questionnaire sheets. The subjects in this study were 48 students who were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 24 students using the problem-based learning model, and the second group consisted of 24 students using the inquiry-based learning model. The results of the study showed that: There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles in improving the learning outcomes in the cognitive and affective domains. There is no interaction between learning models and learning styles in improving psychomotor domains. The learning model of inquiry-based learning was more effective to be used in the learning than the problem-based learning models in improving student learning outcomes (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor) in the class with heterogeneous student learning styles (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic).</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/32148</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 5 (2019): June 2019; 206-216</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/32148/14307</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>