Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

An Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability of Elementary School Students Through Model Contextual Teaching and Learning on Social Learning

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 7 (2019) · hlm. 24–31

ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Terbit
2019-09-02
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Critical thinking ability of students in learning social science has not been measured in the learning process. The purpose of this study tests the effectiveness of the model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) toward the students’ critical thinking ability, describe the process of analysis of students’ critical thinking ability. This type of study was a mixed-method, with sequential explanatory design. Samples of this study were grade V Public Elementary School 01 Rajekwesi, Jepara and Public Elementary School 01 Datar, Jepara. The data collection was conducted by a test, interview, and documentation. Quantitative data analysis techniques using the test and qualitative data analysis techniques with the triangulation of the data in the form of tests, interview, and documentation. The results showed that CTL model learning effectively improved critical thinking ability. Result of the average different test of the independent table column sig test sample (2-tailed) of 0.00 ˂ 0.05, this means that H1 accepted, the average critical thinking ability of CTL class is better than the expository class. Classical completeness of test results of the CTL class 80.95% students achieve at grade expository minimum completeness criteria (MCC), and that is equal to 76%. Test results of the average increase of the critical thinking ability in the classroom CTL by 30.33 and the expository class of 17.76. The description of the critical thinking ability of students in the expository class that belong to the criteria of good were the indicators of reasons and inference, which included in the criteria of moderate were an indicator of focus, situation, clarity, and overview. Meanwhile, in the classroom with CTL that belong to the good criteria were indicators of reasons, inference, focus, situation, clarity, whereas the overview included in the criteria of moderate.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 112 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Tarumanagara University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Eko HandoyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Muh. SholehAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hamdan Tri AtmajaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Noviani Achmad PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Andy SuryadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wasino WasinoTarumanagara University2
Juhadi JuhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yusuf FalaqAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Eva BanowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rusdarti RusdartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Slamet SurosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Samsudi SamsudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohamad FadliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ratna Juwita Dian PrabawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri WardaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ganda Febri KurniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ufi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Exsan Ali SetyonugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali SodikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ayun HaifaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ibnu SodiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tsabit Azinar AhmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Idha WinarsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul MuntholibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siswati SiswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syaiful AminAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Meilatia KartikasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bain BainAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohammad Syaiful BakhriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aniza Oktarina WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anisatul ChasanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika PrajantiState University of Semarang1
Yulina IsmiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Imam KusmaryonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Nur HudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nugroho Trisnu BrataAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Irin Maulana BahtiarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">An Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability of Elementary School Students Through Model Contextual Teaching and Learning on Social Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Syah, Imam Ma`arif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suyahmo, Suyahmo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Utomo, Cahyo Budi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Critical thinking ability of students in learning social science has not been measured in the learning process. The purpose of this study tests the effectiveness of the model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) toward the students’ critical thinking ability, describe the process of analysis of students’ critical thinking ability. This type of study was a mixed-method, with sequential explanatory design. Samples of this study were grade V Public Elementary School 01 Rajekwesi, Jepara and Public Elementary School 01 Datar, Jepara. The data collection was conducted by a test, interview, and documentation. Quantitative data analysis techniques using the test and qualitative data analysis techniques with the triangulation of the data in the form of tests, interview, and documentation. The results showed that CTL model learning effectively improved critical thinking ability. Result of the average different test of the independent table column sig test sample (2-tailed) of 0.00 ˂ 0.05, this means that H1 accepted, the average critical thinking ability of CTL class is better than the expository class. Classical completeness of test results of the CTL class 80.95% students achieve at grade expository minimum completeness criteria (MCC), and that is equal to 76%. Test results of the average increase of the critical thinking ability in the classroom CTL by 30.33 and the expository class of 17.76. The description of the critical thinking ability of students in the expository class that belong to the criteria of good were the indicators of reasons and inference, which included in the criteria of moderate were an indicator of focus, situation, clarity, and overview. Meanwhile, in the classroom with CTL that belong to the good criteria were indicators of reasons, inference, focus, situation, clarity, whereas the overview included in the criteria of moderate.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-09-02</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/33826</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 7 (2019): September 2019; 24-31</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/33826/14148</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>