Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effectiveness of Cooperative and Conventional Physical education Models and the Availability of Facilities for Physical education Management

Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport · Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 629–639

DOI
10.15294/jpehs.v12i2.38505
ISSN
2354-7901, 2354-8231
Terbit
2025-12-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The traditional model of physical education, where the teacher is often central to the process, on the contrary, involves more knowledge transfer and organized instructions of a teacher. Although this model might prove to be efficient in delivering a high collection of information to students, it might limit the student interaction and decreasing reflective physical education. Access to physical education amenities is one of the determinants of the success of the two models. Digital tools, proper classrooms, physical education media, and the availability of resources can all be used to positively influence motivation and practical physical education experiences as well as support diverse instruction methods. It has been theorized in literature that cooperative physical education is more likely to succeed when the facilities are oriented to group work as opposed to the very likely success of conventional physical education in environments where teacher control and direct instruction are important. For the effectiveness of any model, consequently, there is not only the design of instruction but also the physical education environment in which the implementation of the model takes place. In general, the literature results suggest that the cooperative physical education tends to create more active and cooperative physical education experiences whereas the traditional physical education is still valuable when delivering formal knowledge. To achieve the management of physical education optimization and enhance educational performance, it is important to ensure that facilities are sufficient and well aligned with the selected model.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

27 penulis · 66 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 5 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Tamkang University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Hendra MashuriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
I Ketut SemarayasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Made Agus WijayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
I Wayan ArtanayasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
I Kadek Angga PrabawanataAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nyoman Putra Arya GunawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Made Diah Karisma UtamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
I Gede Ari Septena PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
I Gde Wawan SudathaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
Ni Wayan RatiUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
Kadek Ari DwiarwatiUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
I Nyoman Tri EsaputraUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
C. ChiuTamkang University1
Ni Komang Kristina DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Komang Sukarata AdnyanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ida Bagus Arta Pratihara NandanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Peby GunartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Gede SuwiwaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ida Bagus Made BukitAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Made Arya KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Wayan MuliartaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Gede BerataAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Putu Bayu SastrawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ketut Chandra Adinata KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpehs/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Effectiveness of Cooperative and Conventional Physical education Models and the Availability of Facilities for Physical education Management</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nita Peranita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kadek Yogi Parta Lesmana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">I Made Satyawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Cooperative Physical Education; Conventional Physical Education; Physical Education Facilities; Physical Education Management; Instructional Effectiveness </dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The traditional model of physical education, where the teacher is often central to the process, on the contrary, involves more knowledge transfer and organized instructions of a teacher. Although this model might prove to be efficient in delivering a high collection of information to students, it might limit the student interaction and decreasing reflective physical education. Access to physical education amenities is one of the determinants of the success of the two models. Digital tools, proper classrooms, physical education media, and the availability of resources can all be used to positively influence motivation and practical physical education experiences as well as support diverse instruction methods. It has been theorized in literature that cooperative physical education is more likely to succeed when the facilities are oriented to group work as opposed to the very likely success of conventional physical education in environments where teacher control and direct instruction are important. For the effectiveness of any model, consequently, there is not only the design of instruction but also the physical education environment in which the implementation of the model takes place. In general, the literature results suggest that the cooperative physical education tends to create more active and cooperative physical education experiences whereas the traditional physical education is still valuable when delivering formal knowledge. To achieve the management of physical education optimization and enhance educational performance, it is important to ensure that facilities are sufficient and well aligned with the selected model.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpehs/article/view/38505</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpehs.v12i2.38505</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025); 629 - 639</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2354-7901</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2354-8231</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpehs.v12i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpehs/article/view/38505/8124</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>