Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Direct Instruction and Teaching Games for Understanding in Volleyball Learning

Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport · Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 507–513

DOI
10.15294/jpehs.v12i2.39168
ISSN
2354-7901, 2354-8231
Terbit
2025-12-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Direct Instruction (DI) and Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) learning models in improving volleyball game performance among beginner-level extracurricular participants at State Junior High School 12 Bandung. A quasi-experimental method with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design was used. The sample taken in this study consisted of 10 students, each divided into two groups: DI (n=5) and TGFU (n=5). In this study, the Game Performance Assessment Instrument was used as the research instrument. Statistical hypotheses were tested using paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test. The results showed that both models significantly improved volleyball game performance (p < 0.05). However, the improvement in the DI group (mean pretest 41.12 to posttest 85.80) was significantly higher than in the TGFU group (mean pretest 41.00 to posttest 63.40). the independent sample t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.000). It was concluded that H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, so the DI model is more effective in improving volleyball game performance among beginners with low basic technical skills, likely due to its structured, technique-focused approach. These findings provide practical implications for physical education teachers in selecting and sequencing learning models according to student foundational skill levels.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 99 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • University of Malaya
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Agus GumilarIndonesia University of Education5
Yusuf HidayatIndonesia University of Education5
SuciptoIndonesia University of Education2
NuryadiIndonesia University of Education2
Muhamad Rafli SahrullahIndonesia University of Education2
Reza Syaef NuralieIndonesia University of Education2
Kimi Aditya RizkiIndonesia University of Education1
Wulandari Eka PutriIndonesia University of Education1
Allifa Dwi ApriIndonesia University of Education1
Fikri FirdiansyahIndonesia University of Education1
Aditia Putra MunggaranIndonesia University of Education1
Alya DaviyatiIndonesia University of Education1
Jajat Darajat Kusumah NegaraIndonesia University of Education1
- Kevin Naufal DirgantaraIndonesia University of Education1
Ganjar NugrahaIndonesia University of Education1
Adi Maulana MahmudIndonesia University of Education1
Yudi HendrayanaIndonesia University of Education1
Ari Gana YuliantoIndonesia University of Education1
Mohd Salleh AmanUniversity of Malaya1
Gilang Sukma PermanaIndonesia University of Education1
Carsiwan CarsiwanIndonesia University of Education1
Nurul Nadiah ShahudinUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Helmy FirmansyahIndonesia University of Education1
Dhea Yolanda AzaliaIndonesia University of Education1
Asep SumpenaIndonesia University of Education1
Wili RafiandiIndonesia University of Education1
Nadia Fadilla DamayantiIndonesia University of Education1
Lusi AngeliaUniversitas Negeri Padang1
Suherman SlametIndonesia University of Education1
Wanda PerbawantiIndonesia University of Education1
Adang SuhermanIndonesia University of Education1
Agi GinanjarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yudy HendrayanaIndonesia University of Education1
Dini TresnadianiIndonesia University of Education1
Yusuf HidayatIndonesia University of Education1
Lutfi NurIndonesia University of Education1
Sucipto SuciptoIndonesia University of Education1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpehs/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Direct Instruction and Teaching Games for Understanding in Volleyball Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Dian Fatimah Sobari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tite Juliantine</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Burhan Hambali</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Direct Instruction</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Teaching Games for Understanding</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Game Performance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Volleyball</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Direct Instruction (DI) and Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) learning models in improving volleyball game performance among beginner-level extracurricular participants at State Junior High School 12 Bandung. A quasi-experimental method with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design was used. The sample taken in this study consisted of 10 students, each divided into two groups: DI (n=5) and TGFU (n=5). In this study, the Game Performance Assessment Instrument was used as the research instrument. Statistical hypotheses were tested using paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test. The results showed that both models significantly improved volleyball game performance (p &amp;lt; 0.05). However, the improvement in the DI group (mean pretest 41.12 to posttest 85.80) was significantly higher than in the TGFU group (mean pretest 41.00 to posttest 63.40). the independent sample t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.000). It was concluded that H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, so the DI model is more effective in improving volleyball game performance among beginners with low basic technical skills, likely due to its structured, technique-focused approach. These findings provide practical implications for physical education teachers in selecting and sequencing learning models according to student foundational skill levels.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpehs/article/view/39168</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpehs.v12i2.39168</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025); 507 - 513</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2354-7901</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2354-8231</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpehs.v12i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpehs/article/view/39168/7796</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>