Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effect of Training Method and Arm Length on Spike Back Attack Ability in Junior Athletes of Bina Taruna Semarang Volleyball Club

Journal of Physical Education and Sports · Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022) · hlm. 504–509

DOI
10.15294/jpes.v11i4.71926
ISSN
2502-4477, 2252-648X
Terbit
2022-12-30
Penerbit
Study Program Education and Sports, Postgraduate Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference in the effect of hanging ball training methods and self-throwing ball training methods, above-average arm length and below-average arm length, and whether there is an interaction between training methods and arm length on the ability of spike back attacks in junior volleyball athletes. This study used an experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. The population in this study was 25 junior athletes of Bina Taruna Semarang volleyball club. The sample of this study was 20 athletes taken by purposive sampling technique. The instruments in this study used an anthropometer and a Robert E Laveaga spike test. Data analysis in this study used the ANOVA test (two-way) followed by the Tukey test with a significant level of α = 0.05. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There is a difference in the effect between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 9.308 with a significance of 0.008. (2) There is a difference in arm length (above average and below average) on the ability to spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024. (3) There is an interaction between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) and arm length (above average and below average) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 151 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rumini RuminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Tri RustiadiState University of Semarang6
Soegiyanto SoegiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Setya RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Fajar Awang IrawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Taufiq HidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Tandiyo RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Harry PramonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri SumartiningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sugiharto SugihartoUniversitas Airlangga3
Ranu Baskora Aji PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tommy SoenyotoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Donny Wira Yudha KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Donny Wira Yudha KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mugiyo HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Cahyo YuwonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moch Fahmi AbdulazizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daffa Tryan WidiartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tri NurharsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adi SAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Imam MahfudzAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SulaimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Tiga PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ari Mukti PamungkasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Roas IrsyadaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Rizal AmanullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Tiga PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Damar Adi SusetyoState University of Semarang1
Krisna MuktiState University of Semarang1
Agnestasia Regina Adityas KusumaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Oktaviana Wulan NugraheniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Habib Azmi WidiyatmokoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muchammad Ichwal Akbar MaulanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Erlina Puji ApriyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Egy RaihanatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endra SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Danti PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpes/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effect of Training Method and Arm Length on Spike Back Attack Ability in Junior Athletes of Bina Taruna Semarang Volleyball Club</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hidayatullah, Ahmad Fahmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nasuka, Nasuka</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wahyudi, Agung</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference in the effect of hanging ball training methods and self-throwing ball training methods, above-average arm length and below-average arm length, and whether there is an interaction between training methods and arm length on the ability of spike back attacks in junior volleyball athletes. This study used an experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. The population in this study was 25 junior athletes of Bina Taruna Semarang volleyball club. The sample of this study was 20 athletes taken by purposive sampling technique. The instruments in this study used an anthropometer and a Robert E Laveaga spike test. Data analysis in this study used the ANOVA test (two-way) followed by the Tukey test with a significant level of α = 0.05. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There is a difference in the effect between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 9.308 with a significance of 0.008. (2) There is a difference in arm length (above average and below average) on the ability to spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024. (3) There is an interaction between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) and arm length (above average and below average) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Study Program Education and Sports, Postgraduate Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpes/article/view/71926</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpes.v11i4.71926</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Physical Education and Sports; Vol 11 No 4 (2022): December 2022; 504-509</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4477</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-648X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpes.v11i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpes/article/view/71926/24937</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Physical Education and Sports</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>