SACRALIZATION OF PANCASILA: IDEOLOGY AND REPRESSION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PANCASILA IDEOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BPIP) AND GUIDELINES FOR THE APPRECIATION AND PRACTICE OF PANCASILA (P4)

Mustapa, Hasan; Zulkarnaen, Nanang; Feny Yuniarti, Putri

doi:10.15294/jpi.v9i1.3466

Jurnal

SACRALIZATION OF PANCASILA: IDEOLOGY AND REPRESSION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PANCASILA IDEOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BPIP) AND GUIDELINES FOR THE APPRECIATION AND PRACTICE OF PANCASILA (P4)

Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024) · hlm. 52–67

DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v9i1.3466
ISSN: 2503-4456, 2477-8060
Terbit: 2024-04-19
Penerbit: Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa: eng

Abstrak

Pancasila's role has become an unavoidable topic of dispute. For intellectuals, Pancasila should be an open ideology. The authorities frequently make Pancasila a closed doctrine. Ideology becomes closed when it is officially implemented by the state and interpreted unilaterally to assess incompatibility with societal interpretations. This qualitative study compares New Order government policies to the Guidelines for the Appreciation and Practice of Pancasila (P4) project run by the Pancasila Ideology Development Agency (BPIP). Various journal papers were collected, evaluated, and seen through the lens of ideology and repression. According to the research findings, when Pancasila was institutionalized, such as during the New Order period, it was frequently employed as a beating stick for parties that disagreed with the government's political goals. This potential can also be observed in BPIP during Joko Widodo's tenure, if executed strictly. Pancasila is founded on the principle of openness, which was echoed by the Founding Fathers. Often told behind closed doors using a frozen sacralization procedure.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

10 penulis · 18 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung
Nanjing Normal University
Afiliasi tidak diketahui

Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel

Tampilkan sebagai tabel

Rekan penulis	Organisasi	Artikel bersama
Mohammad Hadi Asykur Baraka	Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung	2
Naan Naan	Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung	1
Nanang Gozali	Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung	1
Ruhenda Ruhenda	Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung	1
Siti Yasyfina	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Azhar Ahmad	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Alfredes Nurmayanti	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpi/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.

Metadata asli (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">SACRALIZATION OF PANCASILA: IDEOLOGY AND REPRESSION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PANCASILA IDEOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BPIP) AND GUIDELINES FOR THE APPRECIATION AND PRACTICE OF PANCASILA (P4)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mustapa, Hasan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Zulkarnaen, Nanang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Feny Yuniarti, Putri</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pancasila sacralization; Ideology; Repression; P4; BPIP.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Pancasila's role has become an unavoidable topic of dispute. For intellectuals, Pancasila should be an open ideology. The authorities frequently make Pancasila a closed doctrine. Ideology becomes closed when it is officially implemented by the state and interpreted unilaterally to assess incompatibility with societal interpretations. This qualitative study compares New Order government policies to the Guidelines for the Appreciation and Practice of Pancasila (P4) project run by the Pancasila Ideology Development Agency (BPIP). Various journal papers were collected, evaluated, and seen through the lens of ideology and repression. According to the research findings, when Pancasila was institutionalized, such as during the New Order period, it was frequently employed as a beating stick for parties that disagreed with the government's political goals. This potential can also be observed in BPIP during Joko Widodo's tenure, if executed strictly. Pancasila is founded on the principle of openness, which was echoed by the Founding Fathers. Often told behind closed doors using a frozen sacralization procedure.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-04-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpi/article/view/3466</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpi.v9i1.3466</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): General Issues; 52-67 </dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-4456</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-8060</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpi.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpi/article/view/3466/2246</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>