Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

Development of a Geographic Information System Quality Evaluation Framework Using WebQual 4.0 and ISO/IEC 25010 Approaches: A Case Study on Bali Province Balisatudata Website

Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025) · pp. 721–737

DOI
10.51454/decode.v5i2.1204
ISSN
2775-1813, 2775-2984
Published
2025-07-31
Publisher
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Abstract

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are important tools for managing spatial data in various sectors such as urban planning and environmental management. However, poor GIS quality can hinder accurate decision-making. This study aims to develop an integrated GIS quality evaluation framework by combining two approaches: WebQual 4.0 and ISO 25010. WebQual 4.0 focuses on quality from the user's perspective, while ISO 25010 evaluates the technical characteristics of the software.This research was conducted to evaluate the impact of comparing measurement results using the WebQual 4.0 and ISO 25010 methods on GIS quality, as well as to develop an integrated framework that includes practical recommendations for evaluating GIS quality using the WebQual 4.0 and ISO 25010 methods. Data was collected from 100 active GIS users on the balisatudata.baliprov.go.id website and analyzed using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method. The results showed that the integration of the two methods produced a more comprehensive evaluation of GIS quality compared to a single method. Key findings include quality attributes that need improvement, such as classification accuracy and data position accuracy, as well as system accessibility and reliability. This framework provides an important contribution as a guideline for GIS developers in improving system quality from technical, data, and user satisfaction aspects, as well as a basis for data-driven decision-making.

Collaboration network of the authors

28 authors · 50 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Chastine FatichahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Hisyam FahmiUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Diana PurwitasariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Daniel SiahaanInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Dian SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Esti YuniarAffiliation unknown1
Joko Lianto BulialiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Dwi SunaryonoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Afrizal Laksita AkbarInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hazna At ThooriqohInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Tiara Nur AnnisaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Muhammad Muharrom Al HaromainyInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Eka Alifia KusnantiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Lauretha Devi Fajar VantieInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Ary Mazharuddin ShiddiqiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Muhammad Faisal FananiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Ignatius Aris WibowoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hilmil PradanaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Amelia Devi Putri AriyantoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Lutfiyatul †̃AzizahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Wahyu Fajar SetiawanAffiliation unknown1
Ilham Putra AriatamaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad AlfianAffiliation unknown1
Riyanarto SarnoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hermawan Bin FauzanInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2775-1813/works, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Development of a Geographic Information System Quality Evaluation Framework Using WebQual 4.0 and ISO/IEC 25010 Approaches: A Case Study on Bali Province Balisatudata Website</dc:title><dc:creator>Oka Cahyadi Pradipta, I Gusti Lanang Agung</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yuhana, Umi Laili</dc:creator><dc:creator>Saikhu, Ahmad</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are important tools for managing spatial data in various sectors such as urban planning and environmental management. However, poor GIS quality can hinder accurate decision-making. This study aims to develop an integrated GIS quality evaluation framework by combining two approaches: WebQual 4.0 and ISO 25010. WebQual 4.0 focuses on quality from the user's perspective, while ISO 25010 evaluates the technical characteristics of the software.This research was conducted to evaluate the impact of comparing measurement results using the WebQual 4.0 and ISO 25010 methods on GIS quality, as well as to develop an integrated framework that includes practical recommendations for evaluating GIS quality using the WebQual 4.0 and ISO 25010 methods. Data was collected from 100 active GIS users on the balisatudata.baliprov.go.id website and analyzed using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method. The results showed that the integration of the two methods produced a more comprehensive evaluation of GIS quality compared to a single method. Key findings include quality attributes that need improvement, such as classification accuracy and data position accuracy, as well as system accessibility and reliability. This framework provides an important contribution as a guideline for GIS developers in improving system quality from technical, data, and user satisfaction aspects, as well as a basis for data-driven decision-making.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-07-31</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51454/decode.v5i2.1204</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.51454/decode.v5i2.1204</dc:identifier><dc:source>Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi; Vol 5 No 2 (2025); 721-737</dc:source><dc:source>2775-1813</dc:source><dc:source>2775-2984</dc:source><dc:relation>https://journal.umkendari.ac.id/decode/article/download/1204/631</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>