Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Legal Position of Digital Forensic Experts in the Settlement of Information Technology Crime Cases

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024) · hlm. 355–384

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2952
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2024-09-22
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Digital forensic expert testimony is required by judges to resolve cases related to information technology. However, there are allegations of violations committed by certain parties on several servers such as illegal access, configuration changes, and shutdowns. This is increased by the destruction of crime scene and digital evidence. In some cases, analyzing the data collected can be time-consuming, and practical understanding is needed by judges to avoid irrelevant questions for digital forensic experts in court. Therefore, this research aims to determine and analyze forensic digital experts in court hearings, the duties and roles of judges in resolving information and technology cases as well as the position of forensic experts in the judicial process. The doctrinal research is sourced from secondary data in the form of Electronic Information and Transaction laws, criminal procedure laws, research reports, books, and scientific journals. The results show that digital forensics expert testimony is needed to assist judges as gatekeepers in obtaining material truth. Practical digital forensic knowledge is used to increase the efficiency of case examination time by avoiding irrelevant questions. Best practices are used in the actions, procedures, handling, and analysis of electronic evidence as well as digital forensic expert testimony in judicial practice.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

24 penulis · 60 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 28 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto
  • Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
  • Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • IPB University
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yusuf SaefudinMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto4
Indriati AmariniMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto2
Aina MusdholifahUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Sri T. HartatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Zeehan Fuad AttamimiMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto1
Astika Nurul HidayahMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto1
Istianah IstianahIPB University1
Ika Ariani KartiniMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto1
Marsitiningsih MarsitiningsihMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto1
Rena YuliaSultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1
Chairul HudaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta1
Muhamad RomdoniSultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1
Lutfhi Kalbu AdiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahtami SusantiMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto1
Supanto SupantoSebelas Maret University1
Nurani Ajeng Tri UtamiJenderal Soedirman University1
Setya WahyudiJenderal Soedirman University1
Agus RaharjoJenderal Soedirman University1
Rahadi Wasi BintoroJenderal Soedirman University1
Kuat Puji PrayitnoJenderal Soedirman University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Legal Position of Digital Forensic Experts in the Settlement of Information Technology Crime Cases</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amarini, Indriati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Cahyadri, Rizky Aulia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fitriani, Maulida Ayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ismail, Noorfajri</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Digital forensic expert testimony is required by judges to resolve cases related to information technology. However, there are allegations of violations committed by certain parties on several servers such as illegal access, configuration changes, and shutdowns. This is increased by the destruction of crime scene and digital evidence.  In some cases, analyzing the data collected can be time-consuming, and practical understanding is needed by judges to avoid irrelevant questions for digital forensic experts in court. Therefore, this research aims to determine and analyze forensic digital experts in court hearings, the duties and roles of judges in resolving information and technology cases as well as the position of forensic experts in the judicial process. The doctrinal research is sourced from secondary data in the form of Electronic Information and Transaction laws, criminal procedure laws, research reports, books, and scientific journals. The results show that digital forensics expert testimony is needed to assist judges as gatekeepers in obtaining material truth. Practical digital forensic knowledge is used to increase the efficiency of case examination time by avoiding irrelevant questions. Best practices are used in the actions, procedures, handling, and analysis of electronic evidence as well as digital forensic expert testimony in judicial practice.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-09-22</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/2952</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2952</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context; 355-384</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v8i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/2952/1546</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Indriati Amarini, Rizky Aulia Cahyadri, Maulida Ayu Fitriani, Noorfajri Ismail (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>