Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Modelling Shared Assets in Indonesia’s Forfeiture Bill: International Collaboration and Digital Networks

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 1313–1363

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v9i1.10606
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2025-05-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Article 54, paragraph 3, of the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) encourages countries to implement efforts to confiscate assets resulting from crimes committed without a criminal conviction, often known as in rem. Indonesia is one of the countries that ratified the UNCAC with Law No. 7 of 2006. Further implementation of in rem forfeiture is outlined in the Asset Forfeiture Bill, which regulates the mechanism for in rem forfeiture of assets in detail. The bill also regulates asset sharing, previously only accommodated by Article 57 of Law No. 1 of 2006 concerning Mutual Assistance. Aside from being a solution to overcoming the cost of forfeiture, which tends to be large, asset sharing is also intended to prevent the interference of other forces that cause the forfeiture process not to run effectively. This mechanism also precludes different parties from sharing burdens and benefits (a win-win solution). Asset sharing is practiced in some countries, such as the United States, Switzerland, and Canada.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

16 penulis · 35 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Lampung University
  • Kanazawa University
  • University of Debrecen
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Fransiscus Xaverius SumarjaLampung University1
Tien Dung NguyenUniversity of Debrecen1
Dianne Eka RusmawatiLampung University1
Bagas Wahyu WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizki Dwi PrasetyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wijayanti Dwi AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prastowo MurtiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jihan Zeinyuta RosafiraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adhika WidyaparagaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tetsushi BiwaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rudi NatamiharjaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Modelling Shared Assets in Indonesia’s Forfeiture Bill: International Collaboration and Digital Networks</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sujadmiko, Bayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rohaini, Rohaini</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Otomo, Nobuhide</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Setiawan, Ikhsan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Azizah, Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Asset Recovery</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">In Rem Forfeiture</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Mechanism</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Article 54, paragraph 3, of the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) encourages countries to implement efforts to confiscate assets resulting from crimes committed without a criminal conviction, often known as in rem. Indonesia is one of the countries that ratified the UNCAC with Law No. 7 of 2006. Further implementation of in rem forfeiture is outlined in the Asset Forfeiture Bill, which regulates the mechanism for in rem forfeiture of assets in detail. The bill also regulates asset sharing, previously only accommodated by Article 57 of Law No. 1 of 2006 concerning Mutual Assistance. Aside from being a solution to overcoming the cost of forfeiture, which tends to be large, asset sharing is also intended to prevent the interference of other forces that cause the forfeiture process not to run effectively. This mechanism also precludes different parties from sharing burdens and benefits (a win-win solution). Asset sharing is practiced in some countries, such as the United States, Switzerland, and Canada.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-05-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/10606</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v9i1.10606</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in the Digital Justice Era ; 1313-1363</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/10606/4290</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Bayu Sujadmiko, Rohaini Rohaini, Nobuhide Otomo, Ikhsan Setiawan, Nurul Azizah (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>