Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Reforming Justice: Unpacking the Pre-Judication and Post-Judicate Dynamics of the Sarpin Case in Law and Practice in Indonesia

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 1089–1116

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v8i2.10744
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2024-12-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This paper critically examines the Sarpin case within the context of Indonesia's criminal justice system, focusing on the legal reformation of pretrial procedures and their impact on the protection of suspects' human rights. Indonesia's criminal justice system adheres to the principle of presumption of innocence, which underscores the importance of safeguarding individual rights throughout the legal process. The introduction of the pretrial institution under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has introduced significant shifts in judicial practices, particularly in evaluating coercive measures such as arrest, detention, and the termination of investigations. This research addresses three key questions: first, how pretrial procedures are regulated from the perspective of criminal law; second, how the reform of pretrial practices has been influenced by Judge Sarpin's landmark decision; and third, the broader implications of his ruling on the protection of human rights within the Indonesian criminal process. The paper utilizes a normative research method, analyzing relevant statutes and legal concepts through a statutory approach. In the Sarpin case, Judge Sarpin ruled that the investigation warrant used to initiate proceedings against Budi Gunawan was invalid, highlighting a critical legal interpretation of pretrial powers. This ruling not only questioned the procedural foundation of the case but also demonstrated the significant role of pretrial in defending the rights of suspects. Article 77 of KUHAP grants district courts the authority to examine the legality of coercive actions, providing a vital safeguard against potential abuses. The paper evaluates how Judge Sarpin's decision has reshaped legal practices in Indonesia, emphasizing its potential to reform both judicial attitudes and the protection of fundamental rights.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 121 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad Azil MaskurAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
PujiyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Chandra Noviardy IrawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Wildan Azkal FikriAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Umi Khaerah PatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Pranoto PranotoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Kukuh TejomurtiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Anis WidyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nur RochaetiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang3
Batari LaskarwatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bayangsari WedhatamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ubaidillah KamalAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Syukron SalamAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aprila NiravitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Iqbal SyariefudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indah Sri UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Barda Nawawi AriefAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Khamami ZadaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Ishar HelmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kukuh Dwi KurniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hasnan BachtiarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bagus Hendradi KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Diana Marlisye HeryantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dona FebianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ery Agus PriyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali Umar HarahapAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Achmad BusroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zico Junius FernandoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aris HardinantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nahdiya SabrinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Nugraha PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heri PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hatma Aditya JananuragaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Diandra Preludio RamadaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nizamuddin AliasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Reforming Justice: Unpacking the Pre-Judication and Post-Judicate Dynamics of the Sarpin Case in Law and Practice in Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sumardiana, Benny </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pujiyono, Pujiyono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Cahyaningtyas, Irma</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Efforts</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pre-trial</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Criminal Justice System</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Presumption of Innocence</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This paper critically examines the Sarpin case within the context of Indonesia's criminal justice system, focusing on the legal reformation of pretrial procedures and their impact on the protection of suspects' human rights. Indonesia's criminal justice system adheres to the principle of presumption of innocence, which underscores the importance of safeguarding individual rights throughout the legal process. The introduction of the pretrial institution under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has introduced significant shifts in judicial practices, particularly in evaluating coercive measures such as arrest, detention, and the termination of investigations. This research addresses three key questions: first, how pretrial procedures are regulated from the perspective of criminal law; second, how the reform of pretrial practices has been influenced by Judge Sarpin's landmark decision; and third, the broader implications of his ruling on the protection of human rights within the Indonesian criminal process. The paper utilizes a normative research method, analyzing relevant statutes and legal concepts through a statutory approach. In the Sarpin case, Judge Sarpin ruled that the investigation warrant used to initiate proceedings against Budi Gunawan was invalid, highlighting a critical legal interpretation of pretrial powers. This ruling not only questioned the procedural foundation of the case but also demonstrated the significant role of pretrial in defending the rights of suspects. Article 77 of KUHAP grants district courts the authority to examine the legality of coercive actions, providing a vital safeguard against potential abuses. The paper evaluates how Judge Sarpin's decision has reshaped legal practices in Indonesia, emphasizing its potential to reform both judicial attitudes and the protection of fundamental rights.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-12-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/10744</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v8i2.10744</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World; 1089-1116</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v8i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/10744/3275</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Benny  Sumardiana, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Irma Cahyaningtyas (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>