Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Digital Transformation of Criminal Justice: A Comparative Examination of Indonesia’s E-Court System and Global Best Practices

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 35–70

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v9i1.14341
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2025-05-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

In an era marked by the algorithmic mediation of human affairs, the pursuit of justice can no longer be disentangled from the architecture of digital systems that sustain it. The criminal justice system, long rooted in analog procedures and institutional inertia, faces an existential imperative: adapt or risk obsolescence. Within this context, digital transformation is not merely an administrative upgrade—it is a normative challenge to the principles of due process, transparency, and equality before the law. Indonesia’s hesitant transition toward e-criminal justice reveals a complex interplay of structural, legal, and epistemic limitations. This study aims to analyze the development of e-criminal justice in Indonesia by conducting a comparative assessment of successful digital judicial systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. Employing a normative legal research approach with a comparative legal method, this study examines primary and secondary legal sources to identify regulatory gaps, procedural challenges, and strategic solutions. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s legal framework remains insufficient in addressing key procedural safeguards, digital evidence authentication, and cybersecurity risks. Additionally, disparities in digital access, resistance from legal practitioners, and inadequate technological infrastructure hinder the effective implementation of e-criminal justice. Comparative analysis suggests that successful digital transformation requires a robust regulatory foundation, secure and interoperable digital platforms, structured judicial training programs, and policies ensuring digital inclusivity. To optimize its e-criminal justice framework, Indonesia must adopt a context-sensitive and adaptive strategy, balancing technological advancements with fundamental principles of procedural fairness and judicial integrity. Future research should explore the long-term impact of digitalization on judicial decision-making, the role of AI in legal processes, and the effectiveness of cybersecurity mechanisms in safeguarding judicial independence. This study contributes to the broader discourse on the intersection between technology and justice, providing recommendations for a sustainable and equitable digital transformation of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

19 penulis · 37 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Padjadjaran University
  • University of Cambridge
  • Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo
  • Universitas Persada Indonesia Yayasan Administrasi Indonesia
  • Universitas Jambi
  • United Arab Emirates University
  • Bandung Islamic University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Widati WulandariPadjadjaran University4
Laila FebrinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yunita SariUniversitas Prof Dr Moestopo1
Essy Malays Sari SaktiUniversitas Persada Indonesia Yayasan Administrasi Indonesia1
Sahuri LasmadiUniversitas Jambi1
Marjan MiharjaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bob HassanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arif AwanggaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Farol MedelinePadjadjaran University1
Rully Herdita RamadhaniPadjadjaran University1
Karem Sayed AboelazmUnited Arab Emirates University1
Lies SulistianiPadjadjaran University1
Destri PrasetyoandiPadjadjaran University1
Salwa SalsabilaBandung Islamic University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Digital Transformation of Criminal Justice: A Comparative Examination of Indonesia’s E-Court System and Global Best Practices</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Aristo Evandy A. Barlian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Atip Latipulhayat</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Elis Rusmiati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widati Wulandari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ahmad Novindri Aji Sukma</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">E-Criminal Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Courts</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judicial Reform</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Evidence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Procedural Fairness</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In an era marked by the algorithmic mediation of human affairs, the pursuit of justice can no longer be disentangled from the architecture of digital systems that sustain it. The criminal justice system, long rooted in analog procedures and institutional inertia, faces an existential imperative: adapt or risk obsolescence. Within this context, digital transformation is not merely an administrative upgrade—it is a normative challenge to the principles of due process, transparency, and equality before the law. Indonesia’s hesitant transition toward e-criminal justice reveals a complex interplay of structural, legal, and epistemic limitations. This study aims to analyze the development of e-criminal justice in Indonesia by conducting a comparative assessment of successful digital judicial systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. Employing a normative legal research approach with a comparative legal method, this study examines primary and secondary legal sources to identify regulatory gaps, procedural challenges, and strategic solutions. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s legal framework remains insufficient in addressing key procedural safeguards, digital evidence authentication, and cybersecurity risks. Additionally, disparities in digital access, resistance from legal practitioners, and inadequate technological infrastructure hinder the effective implementation of e-criminal justice. Comparative analysis suggests that successful digital transformation requires a robust regulatory foundation, secure and interoperable digital platforms, structured judicial training programs, and policies ensuring digital inclusivity. To optimize its e-criminal justice framework, Indonesia must adopt a context-sensitive and adaptive strategy, balancing technological advancements with fundamental principles of procedural fairness and judicial integrity. Future research should explore the long-term impact of digitalization on judicial decision-making, the role of AI in legal processes, and the effectiveness of cybersecurity mechanisms in safeguarding judicial independence. This study contributes to the broader discourse on the intersection between technology and justice, providing recommendations for a sustainable and equitable digital transformation of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-05-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/14341</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v9i1.14341</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in the Digital Justice Era ; 35-70</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/14341/10183</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Aristo Evandy A. Barlian, Atip Latipulhayat, Elis Rusmiati, Widati Wulandari, Ahmad Novindri Aji  Sukma (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>