Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Practice of Using Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law: Obstacles and Challenges

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 67–100

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v10i1.21889
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2026-05-18
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions has a significant impact on the regulation of Cyber Law in Indonesia, including the expansion of evidence recognized in the applicable Law of Procedure in Indonesia. The arrangement of the expansion of the evidence in procedure law provides legal certainty due to the shift in the habits of today’s society which originally survived with conventional habit turning towards digital. The applicable procedural law in Indonesia is an old legal product, including regarding the expansion of valid evidence, but often in the settlement of civil dispute, electronic evidence submitted by private parties is rejected and not even considered at all by the panel of judges examining the case. This research aims to find out how the parties and the panel of judges treat electronic evidence in the examination of evidence. The problem of this research is that there are no specific rules regarding the procedures for taking, examining, verifying and submitting electronic evidence in court. The research method used is normative legal research that uses secondary data and consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Novelty in this research specifically discusses the vagueness of norms against the use of electronic evidence.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

31 penulis · 86 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rosyidi HamzahAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Bambang SutiyosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Admiral AdmiralAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Suparto SupartoUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang2
Esy KurniasihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Selvi AfrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
David HardiagoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Uche NnawuleziAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jacques KabanoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dorcas Adesola ThanniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mary-Ann Onoshoke AjayiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maisa MaisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dodo Wiradana WiriatmaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Teguh Rama PrasjaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohd Izzat Bin Mohd Abd ShukurAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yosia HetharieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isis IkhwansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Valentino Dinatra SoplantilaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Padot Agustinus NaibahoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad AmirullohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zainal MuttaqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
R Benny RiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gede Agung Patra WicaksanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Edward Omar Sharif HiariejAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Elisatris GultomAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nathania Diva DavinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Practice of Using Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law: Obstacles and Challenges</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rahmawati, Ema</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Suparman, Eman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Woodward, John</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Civil Procedure Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Electronic Evidence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Expansion of Evidence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Electronic Information and Transaction Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions has a significant impact on the regulation of Cyber Law in Indonesia, including the expansion of evidence recognized in the applicable Law of Procedure in Indonesia. The arrangement of the expansion of the evidence in procedure law provides legal certainty due to the shift in the habits of today’s society which originally survived with conventional habit turning towards digital. The applicable procedural law in Indonesia is an old legal product, including regarding the expansion of valid evidence, but often in the settlement of civil dispute, electronic evidence submitted by private parties is rejected and not even considered at all by the panel of judges examining the case. This research aims to find out how the parties and the panel of judges treat electronic evidence in the examination of evidence. The problem of this research is that there are no specific rules regarding the procedures for taking, examining, verifying and submitting electronic evidence in court. The research method used is normative legal research that uses secondary data and consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Novelty in this research specifically discusses the vagueness of norms against the use of electronic evidence.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-05-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/21889</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v10i1.21889</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Reform, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Innovation in Contemporary Era; 67-100</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/21889/9748</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Fadhel Arjuna Adinda, Ema Rahmawati, Eman Suparman, John Woodward (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>