Akses terbuka
Jurnal
Standard Agreements: Review of the Principles Pacta Sunt Servanda, Good Faith and Fairness
Lex Scientia Law Review
ISSN 2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit 2025-11-17
Penerbit Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa eng
Abstrak
The use of standardized contracts today shows one side of the dominance of the modern economy by business entities or companies and even banks. Agreement is one of the main sources in civil law relationships, where the parties involved have the freedom to determine the contents and form of the agreement in accordance with Article 1338 of the Civil Code. In practice, this freedom often does not take place in a balanced manner, especially in standardized agreements. This research focuses on the principle of justice in standard agreements, where the agreement should be able to fulfill a sense of justice for the parties. Justice is very important in standard agreements, to avoid exploitative practices and ensure equal legal protection between the parties. Based on this narrative, it is important to examine how the principle of justice is applied, protected, and enforced in standard agreements that develop in the community. The approach used in this study is normative juridical, focusing on secondary data. The results of the study show that the application of the fairness aspect of contracting in agreements or standardized contracts is still far from expectations. Agreements made in standardized forms tend to benefit one party who has a stronger bargaining position, who usually acts as the "designer" of the standardized contract.
Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis
21 penulis ·
54 tautan kepenulisan bersama
· 34 lintas organisasi
Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.
Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en">Standard Agreements: Review of the Principles Pacta Sunt Servanda, Good Faith and Fairness</dc:title>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Priyono, Ery Agus</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Saputra, Dimas Almeida </dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nugroho, Satrio Sakti </dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Asih, Dharu Tri Asih</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Freedom of Contract, Standard Contract, Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">The use of standardized contracts today shows one side of the dominance of the modern economy by business entities or companies and even banks. Agreement is one of the main sources in civil law relationships, where the parties involved have the freedom to determine the contents and form of the agreement in accordance with Article 1338 of the Civil Code. In practice, this freedom often does not take place in a balanced manner, especially in standardized agreements. This research focuses on the principle of justice in standard agreements, where the agreement should be able to fulfill a sense of justice for the parties. Justice is very important in standard agreements, to avoid exploitative practices and ensure equal legal protection between the parties. Based on this narrative, it is important to examine how the principle of justice is applied, protected, and enforced in standard agreements that develop in the community. The approach used in this study is normative juridical, focusing on secondary data. The results of the study show that the application of the fairness aspect of contracting in agreements or standardized contracts is still far from expectations. Agreements made in standardized forms tend to benefit one party who has a stronger bargaining position, who usually acts as the "designer" of the standardized contract.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2025-11-17</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/25800</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v9i2.25800</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): November, 2025: Law, Policy, and Governance in Contemporary Socio-Economic Transformation; 1376-1407</dc:source>
<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v9i2</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/25800/7104</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Ery Agus Priyono, Dimas Almeida Saputra, Satrio Sakti Nugroho, Dharu Tri (Author)</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Sitasi dan pengindeksan
Jumlah menurut tiap indeks pada 13 Nov 2026; setiap indeks menghitung sitasi dengan cara berbeda.
OpenAlex juga mencatat karya ini di: crossref, doaj.
Sitasi artikel ini
APA 7
Priyono, E. A., Saputra, D. A., Nugroho, S. S., & Asih, D. T. A. (2025). Standard Agreements: Review of the Principles Pacta Sunt Servanda, Good Faith and Fairness. Lex Scientia Law Review, 9(2), 1376–1407. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v9i2.25800
Salin
IEEE
E. A. Priyono, D. A. Saputra, S. S. Nugroho, and D. T. A. Asih, “Standard Agreements: Review of the Principles Pacta Sunt Servanda, Good Faith and Fairness,” Lex Scientia Law Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1376–1407, 2025, doi: 10.15294/lslr.v9i2.25800.
Salin
Dibuat dari metadata jurnal; periksa nama penulis sebelum dipakai.