Akses terbuka
Jurnal
Corporate Secrets and the Ambiguity of Article 23: A Critical Analysis of KPPU’s Interpretation
Lex Scientia Law Review
ISSN 2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit 2026-06-25
Penerbit Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa eng
Abstrak
This paper examines the application of the company secret concepts in KPPU decisions number 19/KPPU-L/2007, number 35/KPPU-I/2010, and Number 8/KPPU-L/2024, and how KPPU determines the corporate secrets. This paper employs a normative approach utilising secondary data supported by primary data from interviews with KPPU. The interesting findings indicate that the guidelines of Article 23 of Law Number 5 of 1999 remain unratified in regulations, often leading to company secrets and their criteria being equated with trade secrets as regulated in Law Number 30 of 2000 on Trade Secrets. Then, the objects of corporate secrets differ in the three decisions; the three discuss corporate secrets that must be kept confidential due to their economic value, potentially causing company losses if made public. The paper recommended that the amendments to Law No. 5 of 1999 should include a distinct definition of “company secrets” aligned with global business developments and international best practices. Furthermore, KPPU should adopt a structured rule-of-reason analysis in assessing Article 23 violations by considering the economic impact of information leakage, the perpetrator’s intent, and proportionality to competitive harm to ensure predictability and prevent abuse of authority.
Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis
24 penulis ·
56 tautan kepenulisan bersama
· 34 lintas organisasi
Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.
Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en">Corporate Secrets and the Ambiguity of Article 23: A Critical Analysis of KPPU’s Interpretation</dc:title>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri </dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sabirin, Ahmad</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mayva, Verandha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arranchado, Jimi Rambo R. </dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Company Secrets</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">KPPU</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">rule-of-reason and Unfair Business Competition</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">This paper examines the application of the company secret concepts in KPPU decisions number 19/KPPU-L/2007, number 35/KPPU-I/2010, and Number 8/KPPU-L/2024, and how KPPU determines the corporate secrets. This paper employs a normative approach utilising secondary data supported by primary data from interviews with KPPU. The interesting findings indicate that the guidelines of Article 23 of Law Number 5 of 1999 remain unratified in regulations, often leading to company secrets and their criteria being equated with trade secrets as regulated in Law Number 30 of 2000 on Trade Secrets. Then, the objects of corporate secrets differ in the three decisions; the three discuss corporate secrets that must be kept confidential due to their economic value, potentially causing company losses if made public. The paper recommended that the amendments to Law No. 5 of 1999 should include a distinct definition of “company secrets” aligned with global business developments and international best practices. Furthermore, KPPU should adopt a structured rule-of-reason analysis in assessing Article 23 violations by considering the economic impact of information leakage, the perpetrator’s intent, and proportionality to competitive harm to ensure predictability and prevent abuse of authority.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2026-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/29373</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v10i1.29373</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Reform, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Innovation in Contemporary Era; 339-382</dc:source>
<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v10i1</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/29373/10277</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Sabirin, Anna Maria Tri Anggraini (Author); Thant Thura Zan (Translator); Dian Anriyani (Author)</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Sitasi dan pengindeksan
Jumlah menurut tiap indeks pada 13 Nov 2026; setiap indeks menghitung sitasi dengan cara berbeda.
OpenAlex juga mencatat karya ini di: crossref, doaj.
Sitasi artikel ini
APA 7
Anggraini, A. M. T., Sabirin, A., Mayva, V., & Arranchado, J. R. R. (2026). Corporate Secrets and the Ambiguity of Article 23: A Critical Analysis of KPPU’s Interpretation. Lex Scientia Law Review, 10(1), 339–382. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v10i1.29373
Salin
IEEE
A. M. T. Anggraini, A. Sabirin, V. Mayva, and J. R. R. Arranchado, “Corporate Secrets and the Ambiguity of Article 23: A Critical Analysis of KPPU’s Interpretation,” Lex Scientia Law Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 339–382, 2026, doi: 10.15294/lslr.v10i1.29373.
Salin
Dibuat dari metadata jurnal; periksa nama penulis sebelum dipakai.