Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Regulation Formulation of AI Utilization in Indonesia: The Dilemma between Certainty and Utility to Realize Golden Indonesia Vision

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 583–626

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v10i2.30902
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2026-08-12
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

New regulation formulation methods are needed in the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to argue how the current method of legislative development in Indonesia will need to consider the principles of legal certainty and utility for any future AI laws. These two principles were only elements of the puzzle that were influenced and shaped by other national and local policy needs, which needed considerations by the government. Different from previous investigations that primarily examined AI based on existing rules, this study attempted to provide a different perspective, namely, the dilemma between certainty and utility in formulating AI regulations. A legal-normative method was adopted, and relevant national strategies were analyzed. The results showed that the absence of comprehensive regulations on the use of AI caused legal uncertainty, while opening opportunities for innovation that were not balanced with an adequate ethical and accountability framework. Any AI law needed to balance the considerations with innovation and community protection. Indonesia should also adopt jurisdictions of AI law early, such as the European Union (EU) and the United States (US), as well as international institutions, to inform the development of policy and law. The result of this study was expected to bridge the dilemma between certainty and utility to realize the vision of Golden Indonesia 2045, which was adaptive, responsive, and distinctive through the mastery of ethical and responsible science and technology.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

20 penulis · 38 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Padjadjaran University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Bandung Islamic University
  • Victoria University
  • Monash University, Indonesia
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Suhadi SuhadiState University of Semarang1
Rofi WahanisaState University of Semarang1
Pipit Saputri UtamiState University of Semarang1
Dian PrihantoBandung Islamic University1
Idhofi FahrizalBandung Islamic University1
Neni Sri ImaniyatiBandung Islamic University1
Eni MaryaniPadjadjaran University1
Destiya Puji PrabowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wina ErwinaPadjadjaran University1
Miftahul Heldra SandizaPadjadjaran University1
Rahmat SuparmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ninis Agustini DamayaniPadjadjaran University1
Ute Lies Siti KhadijahPadjadjaran University1
Arief WicaksonoPadjadjaran University1
Kevin RaihanPadjadjaran University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Regulation Formulation of AI Utilization in Indonesia: The Dilemma between Certainty and Utility to Realize Golden Indonesia Vision</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Basir, Mustofa Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Walters, Robert </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rosadi, Sinta Dewi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Bajari, Atwar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Aminanto, Muhamad Erza </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Certainty</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Golden Indonesia Vision</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Regulation Formulation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Utility</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">New regulation formulation methods are needed in the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to argue how the current method of legislative development in Indonesia will need to consider the principles of legal certainty and utility for any future AI laws. These two principles were only elements of the puzzle that were influenced and shaped by other national and local policy needs, which needed considerations by the government. Different from previous investigations that primarily examined AI based on existing rules, this study attempted to provide a different perspective, namely, the dilemma between certainty and utility in formulating AI regulations. A legal-normative method was adopted, and relevant national strategies were analyzed. The results showed that the absence of comprehensive regulations on the use of AI caused legal uncertainty, while opening opportunities for innovation that were not balanced with an adequate ethical and accountability framework. Any AI law needed to balance the considerations with innovation and community protection. Indonesia should also adopt jurisdictions of AI law early, such as the European Union (EU) and the United States (US), as well as international institutions, to inform the development of policy and law. The result of this study was expected to bridge the dilemma between certainty and utility to realize the vision of Golden Indonesia 2045, which was adaptive, responsive, and distinctive through the mastery of ethical and responsible science and technology.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-12</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/30902</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v10i2.30902</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): November, 2026; 583-626</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/30902/11138</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Mustofa Abdul Basir, Robert  Walters, Sinta Dewi Rosadi, Atwar Bajari, Muhamad Erza  Aminanto (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>