Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Smart Local Legislation: Comparative Lessons from Madrid, Taiwan, and Estonia for Indonesia’s Regional Regulation-Making

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 309–346

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v10i2.49896
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2026-10-21
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This article examines the need to transform Indonesia’s regional regulation-making from a predominantly formal and documentary process into a smart, participatory, data-driven, and accountable model of local law-making. The problem addressed is the gap between the normative promise of public participation in regional legislation and the institutional reality in which legal information systems, particularly JDIH, remain focused on documenting enacted regulations rather than facilitating public access to the process of norm formation. Using normative legal research with conceptual and comparative-functional approaches, the article analyses Indonesia’s regulatory framework and examines three functionally selected jurisdictions: Madrid’s platform-based local participation, Taiwan’s deliberative civic technology, and Estonia’s trust-oriented digital infrastructure. These cases are selected not for constitutional similarity but as diverse institutional solutions to one shared functional problem, and each is read together with its critical evaluative literature. The comparison proceeds through a five-variable grid covering point of entry, mode of input processing, identity assurance, obligation to respond, and regulatory traceability. The findings show that smart local legislation requires three integrated functions: participatory access, deliberative processing, and digital trust. JDIH is argued to be the most institutionally viable foundation for this transformation, provided its function is expanded from a passive legal repository into a civic legal infrastructure accommodating legislative agendas, draft regulations, academic manuscripts, open regulatory data, public submissions, harmonization records, version histories, and reasoned institutional responses. The article offers a normative-conceptual framework rather than an empirical evaluation; its propositions are advanced as testable design hypotheses for subsequent implementation research.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

19 penulis · 44 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Gorontalo
  • Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Universitas Tompotika Luwuk
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Indra PerwiraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ali AbdurahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yassine ChamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aan AswariUniversitas Muslim Indonesia1
Hardianto DjanggihUniversitas Tompotika Luwuk1
Mohamad Rivaldi MohaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adelia RachmaniarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Asrul Ibrahim NurAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amancik AmancikAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sonia Ivana BarusAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Putra Perdana Ahmad SaifullohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
ZULKIFLI ZULKIFLIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Roy Marthen MoontiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Ekawaty IsmailAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusna ArsyadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad AhmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Smart Local Legislation: Comparative Lessons from Madrid, Taiwan, and Estonia for Indonesia’s Regional Regulation-Making</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Bunga, Marten</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nggilu, Novendri M.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Aboelazm, Karem</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Smart Local Legislation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">E-Participation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Open Data</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">JDIH</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Regional Regulation-Making</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article examines the need to transform Indonesia’s regional regulation-making from a predominantly formal and documentary process into a smart, participatory, data-driven, and accountable model of local law-making. The problem addressed is the gap between the normative promise of public participation in regional legislation and the institutional reality in which legal information systems, particularly JDIH, remain focused on documenting enacted regulations rather than facilitating public access to the process of norm formation. Using normative legal research with conceptual and comparative-functional approaches, the article analyses Indonesia’s regulatory framework and examines three functionally selected jurisdictions: Madrid’s platform-based local participation, Taiwan’s deliberative civic technology, and Estonia’s trust-oriented digital infrastructure. These cases are selected not for constitutional similarity but as diverse institutional solutions to one shared functional problem, and each is read together with its critical evaluative literature. The comparison proceeds through a five-variable grid covering point of entry, mode of input processing, identity assurance, obligation to respond, and regulatory traceability. The findings show that smart local legislation requires three integrated functions: participatory access, deliberative processing, and digital trust. JDIH is argued to be the most institutionally viable foundation for this transformation, provided its function is expanded from a passive legal repository into a civic legal infrastructure accommodating legislative agendas, draft regulations, academic manuscripts, open regulatory data, public submissions, harmonization records, version histories, and reasoned institutional responses. The article offers a normative-conceptual framework rather than an empirical evaluation; its propositions are advanced as testable design hypotheses for subsequent implementation research.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-21</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/49896</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v10i2.49896</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): November, 2026; 309-346</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/49896/11896</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Marten Bunga, Novendri M. Nggilu, Karem Aboelazm (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>