Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Rethinking Indebtedness according to the Principles of Justice and Equality

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 443–478

DOI
10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.55011
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Terbit
2022-12-20
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The law's objective is to uphold the principle of justice. Contractual debts, interest-bearing debts, unsecured debts, and debts with payment terms are all included in restructuring plans. All debts must be accompanied by a contract. If the business defaults, the contract serves as proof of debt. This research focuses on Indonesia's bankruptcy law. This study employs an empirical qualitative legal method. The study recommends categorizing debt according to its source, duration, function, and collateral. Debts classified as restructuring must waive their collateral rights. This debt grouping is consistent with finance's capital structure theory. This research will revolutionize the current concept of debt restructuring. The study will serve as a resource for all business actors who have documented debt. Debt is uncommon in developing countries such as Indonesia. Entrepreneurs in developing countries have established business relationships based on mutual trust. The study's limitation is that it does not take industry type into account. Additionally, this research has implications for a firm's total cost of capital as a result of changes in the risk model and creditor roles, particularly in developing countries. This study proposes a system of debt classification based on principles of justice and equity. This classification is made not only on the basis of the guarantee's type, but also on the basis of the agreement's duration and financial principles. The purpose of this study is to examine bankruptcy law in developing countries. Knowledge of bankruptcy law will add value to investors and banks on a global scale.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

20 penulis · 32 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin SH.
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Luo Yuan YuanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suwinto JohanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ariawan GunadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Richard Chandra AdamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mella Ismelina Farma RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anthon Freddy SusantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lou YuanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Olga Abigail SugamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ariawan AriawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bhanu Prakash NunnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hamja HamjaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dey RavenaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Markoni MarkoniUniversitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin SH.1
Raita VariaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mella Ismelina F. RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tolib Turgun Ugli RakhmonovAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/lslr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Rethinking Indebtedness according to the Principles of Justice and Equality</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Johan, Suwinto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sudiro, Amad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Gunadi, Ariawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Luo, Yuan Yuan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The law's objective is to uphold the principle of justice. Contractual debts, interest-bearing debts, unsecured debts, and debts with payment terms are all included in restructuring plans. All debts must be accompanied by a contract. If the business defaults, the contract serves as proof of debt. This research focuses on Indonesia's bankruptcy law. This study employs an empirical qualitative legal method. &amp;nbsp;The study recommends categorizing debt according to its source, duration, function, and collateral. Debts classified as restructuring must waive their collateral rights. This debt grouping is consistent with finance's capital structure theory. This research will revolutionize the current concept of debt restructuring. The study will serve as a resource for all business actors who have documented debt. Debt is uncommon in developing countries such as Indonesia. Entrepreneurs in developing countries have established business relationships based on mutual trust. The study's limitation is that it does not take industry type into account. Additionally, this research has implications for a firm's total cost of capital as a result of changes in the risk model and creditor roles, particularly in developing countries. This study proposes a system of debt classification based on principles of justice and equity. This classification is made not only on the basis of the guarantee's type, but also on the basis of the agreement's duration and financial principles. The purpose of this study is to examine bankruptcy law in developing countries. Knowledge of bankruptcy law will add value to investors and banks on a global scale.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/lslr/article/view/55011</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.55011</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Mainstreaming Justice in a Various Global Context; 443-478</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lesrev.v6i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/lslr/article/view/55011/23205</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Suwinto Johan, Amad Sudiro, Ariawan Gunadi, Yuan Yuan Luo</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>