Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Comparative Effectiveness of Learning Cycle 5E-Based and Regular Worksheets on Conceptual Understanding of Current Electricity

Physics Communication · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 97–103

DOI
10.15294/pc.v10i2.58999
ISSN
2528-598X, 2528-5971
Terbit
2026-08-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Conceptual understanding of current electricity requires instructional materials that guide students systematically through exploration, explanation, application, and evaluation. This study compared the effectiveness of student worksheets that explicitly integrated the Learning Cycle 5E phases with that of regular worksheets in supporting junior high school students' conceptual understanding. A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design was employed with two intact ninth-grade classes, comprising 30 students in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Both groups followed the same Learning Cycle 5E instructional sequence; the treatment differed only in the type of worksheet used. Conceptual understanding was measured using a 25-item three-tier multiple-choice test and analyzed using ANCOVA, partial eta squared, Hedges' g, and indicator-level analysis. After controlling for initial ability, the adjusted posttest mean of the experimental group was 54.17, compared with 32.64 for the control group. The difference was significant, F(1, 57) = 44.324, p <.001, with ηp² =.437 and Hedges' g = 1.10, indicating a large between-group effect. Indicator-level analysis showed that the largest between-group difference occurred in interpreting, while summarizing remained the lowest-achieving indicator in the experimental group. Under the conditions of this study, worksheets that explicitly integrated the Learning Cycle 5E phases showed greater comparative effectiveness than regular worksheets in supporting conceptual understanding of current electricity.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 118 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Wahyu HardyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Teguh DarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sulhadi SulhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang3
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang2
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Trida Ridho FarizState University of Semarang2
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang2
Aditya MariantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Virgania SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nuni WidiartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sugiyanto SugiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Faris Al HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Karista Gadis SetiyandaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Faris Al HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Faith Miftah MaulanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arief BudhimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Celfien Septian Widya PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
ListiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Najmah Nur KamilahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hartono HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Listiyanto ListiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti MuhafidhohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyu DefitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Wulan SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pratiwi DwijanantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gilang RamadhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Unes Satuz ZahroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ngurah Made Dharma PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurul ShofiaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Destin SuslianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizki Firda AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Shiva IrfanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Upik NurbaitiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Marosyana Ayu FebrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Fiqhi MahfuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/pc/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Comparative Effectiveness of Learning Cycle 5E-Based and Regular Worksheets on Conceptual Understanding of Current Electricity</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hidayat, Muhammad Syarif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wahyuni, Siti</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Effectiveness</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Learning Cycle 5E</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Current Electricity</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Student Worksheets</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Conceptual Understanding</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Conceptual understanding of current electricity requires instructional materials that guide students systematically through exploration, explanation, application, and evaluation. This study compared the effectiveness of student worksheets that explicitly integrated the Learning Cycle 5E phases with that of regular worksheets in supporting junior high school students' conceptual understanding. A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design was employed with two intact ninth-grade classes, comprising 30 students in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Both groups followed the same Learning Cycle 5E instructional sequence; the treatment differed only in the type of worksheet used. Conceptual understanding was measured using a 25-item three-tier multiple-choice test and analyzed using ANCOVA, partial eta squared, Hedges' g, and indicator-level analysis. After controlling for initial ability, the adjusted posttest mean of the experimental group was 54.17, compared with 32.64 for the control group. The difference was significant, F(1, 57) = 44.324, p &amp;lt; .001, with ηp² = .437 and Hedges' g = 1.10, indicating a large between-group effect. Indicator-level analysis showed that the largest between-group difference occurred in interpreting, while summarizing remained the lowest-achieving indicator in the experimental group. Under the conditions of this study, worksheets that explicitly integrated the Learning Cycle 5E phases showed greater comparative effectiveness than regular worksheets in supporting conceptual understanding of current electricity.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/pc/article/view/58999</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/pc.v10i2.58999</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Physics Communication; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): August 2026; 97-103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-598X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-5971</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/pc.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/pc/article/view/58999/11412</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Physics Communication</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>