Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Power quality considerations for embedded generation integration in Nigeria: A case study of ogba 33 kV injection substation

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v11i2.pp956-965
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2021-04-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The deregulation of the Nigerian power sector has resulted in the quest to explore power generation options for power quality improvement. One of such options is the pattern shift from central power generation to embedded power generation. Network integration of embedded generators (EGs) causes several regulatory, technical and economic issues. This research focuses on power quality challenges that may arise as a result of network integration of embedded generation in a weak electricity networks using Ogba 33 kV injection substation as case study. The embedded generators considered comprised of gas turbine and diesel generators. NEPLAN software was used to perform the load flow analysis with and without EGs connection on the network. This was necessary so as to ascertain the healthiness of the existing distribution network for EGs integration. The power quality issues considered in the study were bus voltage profiles and the total line losses. Simulation results showed that EGs connection improved the voltage profile, for example, bus voltage at PTC 11 kV, improved from 0.881 pu to 0.958 pu while the total active power loss was reduced by 78.16%. The results obtained suggest that the grid is healthy enough to accommodate the EGs with no quality issues.

Collaboration network of the authors

30 authors · 84 co-authorship links · 28 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Covenant University
  • Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
  • Namibia University of Science and Technology
  • Nigerian Defence Academy
  • University of Delta Agbor
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Elizabeth AmutaCovenant University2
Abel Ehimen AirobomanNigerian Defence Academy2
Joseph Anirejuoritse MeneUniversity of Delta Agbor2
Gabriel Oluwatobi SobolaCovenant University2
Daniel OnyemaCovenant University2
C. O. A. AwosopeCovenant University1
Aderibigbe Israel AdekitanCovenant University1
Ayokunle A. AwelewaCovenant University1
Isaac Adekunle SamuelCovenant University1
James KatendeNamibia University of Science and Technology1
Ademola AbdulkareemCovenant University1
Tobiloba SomefunCovenant University1
Oji K. ChinedumCovenant University1
Aderemi A. A. AtayeroCovenant University1
Obinna OkoyeigboCovenant University1
Uyi Aiyudubie SamsonCovenant University1
Anabi Hilary KelechiCovenant University1
Alex AligbeCovenant University1
Oluwaseun Ibrahim AdebisiAffiliation unknown1
Isaiah Adediji AdejumobiAffiliation unknown1
Azeez Aderibigbe AbdulsalamAffiliation unknown1
John Amanesi AbubakarCovenant University1
Olutunde Oluwatimileyin JosiahCovenant University1
Ademola AbdullkareemAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Power quality considerations for embedded generation integration in Nigeria: A case study of ogba 33 kV injection substation</dc:title><dc:creator>F., Agbetuyi Ayoade</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ademola, Abdulkareem</dc:creator><dc:creator>H. E., Orovwode</dc:creator><dc:creator>K., Oladipupo Oluwafemi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Simeon, Matthew</dc:creator><dc:creator>A., Agbetuyi Oluranti</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The deregulation of the Nigerian power sector has resulted in the quest to explore power generation options for power quality improvement. One of such options is the pattern shift from central power generation to embedded power generation. Network integration of embedded generators (EGs) causes several regulatory, technical and economic issues. This research focuses on power quality challenges that may arise as a result of network integration of embedded generation in a weak electricity networks using Ogba 33 kV injection substation as case study. The embedded generators considered comprised of gas turbine and diesel generators. NEPLAN software was used to perform the load flow analysis with and without EGs connection on the network. This was necessary so as to ascertain the healthiness of the existing distribution network for EGs integration. The power quality issues considered in the study were bus voltage profiles and the total line losses. Simulation results showed that EGs connection improved the voltage profile, for example, bus voltage at PTC 11 kV, improved from 0.881 pu to 0.958 pu while the total active power loss was reduced by 78.16%. The results obtained suggest that the grid is healthy enough to accommodate the EGs with no quality issues.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021-04-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i2.pp956-965</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v11i2.pp956-965</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 11 No 2 (2021); 956</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/21985/14719</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>