Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Normative Sports Law Analysis for Global Anti-Doping Justice

ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation · Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 845–850

DOI
10.15294/active.v15i2.49297
ISSN
2460-724X, 2252-6773
Terbit
2026-05-26
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the development of anti-doping regulations from a sports law perspective and to assess the effectiveness of harmonization through the World Anti-Doping Code in ensuring procedural and substantive justice for athletes across jurisdictions. The study employs a normative legal approach with an analytical-critical orientation through an examination of the World Anti-Doping Code, the 2005 UNESCO Convention, and various national regulations that have adopted them. A conceptual approach is applied to examine the theories of polycentric regulation, legal legitimacy, and procedural justice, while a comparative approach is used to test the consistency of implementation across nations. The research findings indicate that the global anti-doping regime has evolved into a hybrid model integrating lex sportiva and international public law, resulting in formal harmonization of testing standards, evidentiary rules, and sanctions. However, significant implementation gaps exist, particularly regarding institutional capacity, access to legal aid, and the speed of dispute resolution, which impact the protection of athletes’ rights and the perceived legitimacy of the system. The study’s conclusions emphasize that normative harmonization does not yet fully align with substantive justice; therefore, strengthening national capacity and implementing policy reforms that are more responsive to social and political contexts are necessary to ensure equitable protection of athletes’ rights globally.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

30 penulis · 87 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 5 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • University of Bengkulu
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad Arief SetiawanUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang5
Dany AuliaUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang2
Afidah SutraliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wajendra Kenny willa tikatAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Liana AzahraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dafa Wishnu MoeraraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Rafi ZulfikarUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang2
Muhammad AbbasUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Muksin MuksinUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Ghozian Muhammad Shidqi PutraUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Cinta Rizky OktarinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dyah Setyo RiniUniversity of Bengkulu1
Elisabeth Evelin KarunaUniversity of Bengkulu1
Tommy JomechoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Stevy Cahya PratiwiUniversity of Bengkulu1
Syfah Nur KaffahUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Achmad Humaedi YusufUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Muhammad Candra KharisUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Deden Akbar IzzuddinUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Faray alfy YusufyUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Aprilia Wulan UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daffaa IkhsanUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Irfan MarhandikaUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Rakha SyamsudinUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/peshr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Normative Sports Law Analysis for Global Anti-Doping Justice</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wisnu hadi, Wisnu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Maulana, Muhammad Adrian </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nugroho, Sigit </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Setiawan, Muhammad Arief </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Damai, A. Ine Aprilia </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Utari, Aprillia Wulan </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Anti-Doping </dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Regulations</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Procedural Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Global Legal Harmonization</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aims to analyze the development of anti-doping regulations from a sports law perspective and to assess the effectiveness of harmonization through the World Anti-Doping Code in ensuring procedural and substantive justice for athletes across jurisdictions. The study employs a normative legal approach with an analytical-critical orientation through an examination of the World Anti-Doping Code, the 2005 UNESCO Convention, and various national regulations that have adopted them. A conceptual approach is applied to examine the theories of polycentric regulation, legal legitimacy, and procedural justice, while a comparative approach is used to test the consistency of implementation across nations. The research findings indicate that the global anti-doping regime has evolved into a hybrid model integrating lex sportiva and international public law, resulting in formal harmonization of testing standards, evidentiary rules, and sanctions. However, significant implementation gaps exist, particularly regarding institutional capacity, access to legal aid, and the speed of dispute resolution, which impact the protection of athletes’ rights and the perceived legitimacy of the system. The study’s conclusions emphasize that normative harmonization does not yet fully align with substantive justice; therefore, strengthening national capacity and implementing policy reforms that are more responsive to social and political contexts are necessary to ensure equitable protection of athletes’ rights globally.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-05-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/peshr/article/view/49297</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/active.v15i2.49297</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026); 845-850</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-724X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6773</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/active.v15i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/peshr/article/view/49297/9895</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>