Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

The quality of service of the deployed LTE technology by mobile network operators in Abuja-Nigeria

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 11 No. 3 (2021)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v11i3.pp2191-2202
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2021-06-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

In this study, the real-world performance analysis of four Nigerian mobile network operators (MNOs), namely MTN, GLO, Airtel, and 9Mobile long-term evolution (LTE) cellular network, were analyzed and compared. The Nigerian MNOs utilize 5 MHz, 10 MH, and 20 MHz channel bandwidths based on third-generation partnership project’s (3 GPPs) recommendation. The presented analysis shows the uplink (UL), and downlink (DL) throughputs gaps in mobility condition as well as other LTE’s system quality of service (QoS) key performance indicators (KPI’s) of: Connection drop rate, connection failure rate, peak physical downlink throughput, minimum radio link control (RLC) downlink throughput threshold and latency are not strictly followed. The reason may be due to a lack of regulatory oversight enforcement. The comparative studies showed that MTN provides the best QoS. The introduction of novel LTE QoS metrics herein referred to as national independent wireless broadband quality reporting (NIWBQR) is the significant contribution of this study. The goal of this study is to show the quality of the network as it affects the user's experience. Important observation showed that all the MNOs are not adhering to the 3 GPPs specified user plane latency of 30 ms and control plane latency of 100 ms, respectively, which makes video streaming and low latency communication a near-impossible task.

Collaboration network of the authors

28 authors · 78 co-authorship links · 23 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Covenant University
  • Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
  • Nigerian Defence Academy
  • University of Delta Agbor
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hope Evwieroghene OrovwodeCovenant University2
Edevbie AgbojeCovenant University2
Evioghene OmuaborCovenant University2
Abidemi M. OrimogunjeCovenant University2
V. O. MatthewsCovenant University1
Segun Isaiah PopoolaCovenant University1
Emmanuel AdetibaCovenant University1
Joke A. BadejoCovenant University1
Ayoade Felix AgbetuyiCovenant University1
Abdulkareem AdemolaCovenant University1
Oladipupo Oluwafemi K.Covenant University1
Agbetuyi Oluranti A.Affiliation unknown1
Oluwaseun Ibrahim AdebisiAffiliation unknown1
Isaiah Adediji AdejumobiAffiliation unknown1
Azeez Aderibigbe AbdulsalamAffiliation unknown1
Olabode Babatunde Idowu-BismarkCovenant University1
F.E. IdachabaCovenant University1
Elizabeth AmutaCovenant University1
Abel Ehimen AirobomanNigerian Defence Academy1
Joseph Anirejuoritse MeneUniversity of Delta Agbor1
Gabriel Oluwatobi SobolaCovenant University1
Daniel OnyemaCovenant University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>The quality of service of the deployed LTE technology by mobile network operators in Abuja-Nigeria</dc:title><dc:creator>Kelechi, Anabi Hilary</dc:creator><dc:creator>Samson, Uyi Aiyudubie</dc:creator><dc:creator>Simeon, Matthew</dc:creator><dc:creator>Obinna, Okoyeigbo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Alex, Aligbe</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aderemi, Atayero Aaron</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;In this study, the real-world performance analysis of four Nigerian mobile network operators (MNOs), namely MTN, GLO, Airtel, and 9Mobile long-term evolution (LTE) cellular network, were analyzed and compared. The Nigerian MNOs utilize 5 MHz, 10 MH, and 20 MHz channel bandwidths based on third-generation partnership project’s (3 GPPs) recommendation. The presented analysis shows the uplink (UL), and downlink (DL) throughputs gaps in mobility condition as well as other LTE’s system quality of service (QoS) key performance indicators (KPI’s) of: Connection drop rate, connection failure rate, peak physical downlink throughput, minimum radio link control (RLC) downlink throughput threshold and latency are not strictly followed. The reason may be due to a lack of regulatory oversight enforcement. The comparative studies showed that MTN provides the best QoS. The introduction of novel LTE QoS metrics herein referred to as national independent wireless broadband quality reporting (NIWBQR) is the significant contribution of this study. The goal of this study is to show the quality of the network as it affects the user's experience. Important observation showed that all the MNOs are not adhering to the 3 GPPs specified user plane latency of 30 ms and control plane latency of 100 ms, respectively, which makes video streaming and low latency communication a near-impossible task.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021-06-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i3.pp2191-2202</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v11i3.pp2191-2202</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 11 No 3 (2021); 2191</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/23207/14767</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>