Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effect of Learning Model Variations on Student Concentration in Solving Problems: A Comprehensive Study

ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation · Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023) · hlm. 302–307

DOI
10.15294/active.v12i3.74016
ISSN
2460-724X, 2252-6773
Terbit
2023-10-11
Penerbit
Department of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Problem solving is a prerequisite for one's survival. A person's inability to solve problems will have a direct impact on his life, including students who are faced with various problems both at school and outside school. Weak problem solving of children can have a negative impact on the decisions taken in dealing with problems so that problems are increasingly tangled and even become one of the causes of student failure and juvenile delinquency. This study aims to see the effect of giving two different learning models based on the level of concentration of students in solving problems. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a treatment design by level 2x2 which concerns two factors. The population in this study was all grade XI students of SMA Negeri 1 Bungo which amounted to 254 students. The sampling technique in this study used a simple random sampling technique. Data was obtained using questionnaires with the instruments used were Grid Concentration test and Problem solving inventory. Data were analyzed using two-track ANOVA at significance level α=0.05. The normality test uses the Liliefors test and the Homogeneity Variance test uses the Bartlett test with a significant level of α=0.05. The results of the data analysis showed that: (1) Overall, there are differences in problem-solving abilities between discovery and cooperative learning models (Sig. 0.048 0.05).

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

34 penulis · 90 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Emral EmralAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Puji HardatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Juhadi JuhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Khairuddin KhairuddinUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Syahrial BakhtiarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
William OktofannyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali MunirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arsil ArsilAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Edo PrantoriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Damrah DamrahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alex Alda YudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eri BarlianUniversitas Negeri Padang1
May Nadira YoviraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bafirman HBAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iqbal RismanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Argantos ArgantosAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ishak AzizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wilda WelisAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ridho BahtraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heru AndikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
widia oktri haningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gusril GusrilAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amin AkbarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SepriadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
ZulbahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Donal SyafriantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rully EffendiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Deva Prasad GhoshAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/peshr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effect of Learning Model Variations on Student Concentration in Solving Problems: A Comprehensive Study</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Budiwanto, Adri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Marheni, Eddy</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ihsan, Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pranoto, Nuridin Widya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Purnomo, Eko</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Zarya, Fiky</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Problem solving is a prerequisite for one's survival. A person's inability to solve problems will have a direct impact on his life, including students who are faced with various problems both at school and outside school. Weak problem solving of children can have a negative impact on the decisions taken in dealing with problems so that problems are increasingly tangled and even become one of the causes of student failure and juvenile delinquency. This study aims to see the effect of giving two different learning models based on the level of concentration of students in solving problems. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a treatment design by level 2x2 which concerns two factors. The population in this study was all grade XI students of SMA Negeri 1 Bungo which amounted to 254 students. The sampling technique in this study used a simple random sampling technique. Data was obtained using questionnaires with the instruments used were Grid Concentration test and Problem solving inventory. Data were analyzed using two-track ANOVA at significance level α=0.05. The normality test uses the Liliefors test and the Homogeneity Variance test uses the Bartlett test with a significant level of α=0.05. The results of the data analysis showed that: (1) Overall, there are differences in problem-solving abilities between discovery and cooperative learning models (Sig. 0.048 &amp;lt; 0.05) (2) There is an interaction between learning models and concentration in solving problems (Sig. 0.025 &amp;lt; 0.05) (3) In groups that have high concentration, the discovery learning model is more effective than the cooperative learning model (Sig. 0.003 &amp;lt; 0.020) (4) In groups that have low concentration, the discovery learning model does not can differ with the cooperative learning model group (Sig. 0.996 &amp;gt; 0.05).</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-10-11</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/peshr/article/view/74016</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/active.v12i3.74016</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation; Vol 12 No 3 (2023); 302-307</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-724X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6773</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/active.v12i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/peshr/article/view/74016/26360</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>