Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Types of Defamation Speech Acts on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019

Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 150–159

DOI
10.15294/seloka.v10i2.45647
ISSN
2502-4493, 2301-6744
Terbit
2021-08-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Nowadays, technological advances make it easier for us to access many things. Technology, especially the internet, can be easily accessed so that everyone can use it without exception. Social media, which is the outcome of technological advances, certainly has some negative impacts. One of the most common impacts, especially in Indonesia, is the defamation speech act. This study discusses the types of defamation speech acts on social media in the 2017-2019 period. It is qualitative descriptive research employing a theoretical approach namely forensic pragmatics. The data in this study were speeches suspected to contain elements of defamation on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019 and violated the ITE Law Article 27 paragraph (3) which has pragmatic power in the form of speech and the type of impoliteness strategy. The data in this study were collected utilizing screenshots of posts on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019 containing elements of defamation and violating the ITE Law Article 27 paragraph (3). This study applied the observation method. The equivalent method was used to analyze the data. The results of this study show that 43.34% of the defamation speech acts are in the form of assertive illocutionary speech act, 40% of expressive illocutionary speech act, 10% of directive illocutionary act, and 33.33% commissive and declarative illocutionary speech act.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 133 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Sriwijaya University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rahayu PristiwatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Rustono RustonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Agus NuryatinAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Etik UmiyatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Hari Bakti MardikantoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Tri Imam MunandarAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ida ZulaehaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Wagiran WagiranAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Imam BaehaqieAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dheny WahyudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mukh DoyinAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nas Haryati SetyaningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Teguh SupriyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Uki Hares YuliantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SyaifudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mijil SetyasihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fathur RokhmanState University of Semarang2
Amril AmrilAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Enggar Diah Puspa ArumAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nurhayani NurhayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Erwin ErwinSriwijaya University2
Andi NajemiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rahma NurjanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Joseph WilsonAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Prabawati NurhabibahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bernadus Wahyudi Joko SantosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tommi YuniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa FahmyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Badrus SirojAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ayu SetiyaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dony Hidayat Al-JananAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrix Noviyanto FirmansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Febrian Arif BudimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hayatun NufusAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusro Edi NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Types of Defamation Speech Acts on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hidayatillah, Adibatina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Subyantoro, Subyantoro</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Haryadi, Haryadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Nowadays, technological advances make it easier for us to access many things. Technology, especially the internet, can be easily accessed so that everyone can use it without exception. Social media, which is the outcome of technological advances, certainly has some negative impacts. One of the most common impacts, especially in Indonesia, is the defamation speech act. This study discusses the types of defamation speech acts on social media in the 2017-2019 period. It is qualitative descriptive research employing a theoretical approach namely forensic pragmatics. The data in this study were speeches suspected to contain elements of defamation on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019 and violated the ITE Law Article 27 paragraph (3) which has pragmatic power in the form of speech and the type of impoliteness strategy. The data in this study were collected utilizing screenshots of posts on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019 containing elements of defamation and violating the ITE Law Article 27 paragraph (3). This study applied the observation method. The equivalent method was used to analyze the data. The results of this study show that 43.34% of the defamation speech acts are in the form of assertive illocutionary speech act, 40% of expressive illocutionary speech act, 10% of directive illocutionary act, and 33.33% commissive and declarative illocutionary speech act.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/seloka/article/view/45647</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/seloka.v10i2.45647</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia; Vol 10 No 2 (2021): August 2021; 150-159</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4493</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2301-6744</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/seloka.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/seloka/article/view/45647/19495</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>