Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Patterns of Hate Speech in The Viewers' Comments Column on The Channel Youtube with The Topic of Puan Maharani In 2019

Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia · Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022) · hlm. 265–274

DOI
10.15294/seloka.v12i1.61794
ISSN
2502-4493, 2301-6744
Terbit
2022-12-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Social media in its use nowadays does not only just pack information, but also provides opportunities to produce information and disseminate information. Furthermore, social media users have the right to choose, determine, and create informative messages or points of view they want; social media may now be a part of human existence and has been consumed massively including Youtube which is one of the most popular social media platforms. However, it cannot be denied that the function of social media can be likened to a double-edged sword; on the one hand it can be used for big activities, but on the other hand it can be used for bad things and is detrimental to society. The problem in this research was "How is the form of hate speech in the viewers’ comments column of the YouTube channel on the topic of Puan Maharani in 2019?". The research design used a qualitative research design that was descriptive with research data using commentary data. This study used transcription techniques and note-taking techniques. The results showed that the highest number of utterances was 300 utterances containing hate speech, nine forms of hate speech were obtained. Of the nine forms of hate speech that were considered to be the style of speech that was widely used by the public in conveying comments on social media. The form of the utterance was a form of hate speech, as much as 96.67% of assertive speech acts.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 111 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Jambi
  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Haryadi HaryadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Ida ZulaehaAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Hari Bakti MardikantoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Agus NuryatinAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Wagiran WagiranAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Uki Hares YuliantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Tommi YuniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rustono RustonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mukh DoyinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SyaifudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Joseph WilsonAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Prabawati NurhabibahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hayatun NufusAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yusro Edi NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ikyboy Van VersieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad FauzanUniversitas Jambi1
Fathur RokhmanState University of Semarang1
Fathur RahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heniningsih HeniningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dandan SupratmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aveny Septi AstrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Emy PurwanitaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitria Nur RohemiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afif Restu FauziAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SyukronAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Reza GhariniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anggar Tri LestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adni RofiqohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Diyamon PrasandhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Septina SulistyaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lutfia FelasifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Budi SusiloAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syarifuloh SyarifulohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mey JayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anggi Miftasha Nuri KhairinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puspita SetyaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi SetyoningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Patterns of Hate Speech in The Viewers' Comments Column on The Channel Youtube with The Topic of Puan Maharani In 2019</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Paramita, Tiara Pradnya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Subyantoro, Subyantoro</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pristiwati, Rahayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Social media in its use nowadays does not only just pack information, but also provides opportunities to produce information and disseminate information. Furthermore, social media users have the right to choose, determine, and create informative messages or points of view they want; social media may now be a part of human existence and has been consumed massively including Youtube which is one of the most popular social media platforms. However, it cannot be denied that the function of social media can be likened to a double-edged sword; on the one hand it can be used for big activities, but on the other hand it can be used for bad things and is detrimental to society. The problem in this research was "How is the form of hate speech in the viewers’ comments column of the YouTube channel on the topic of Puan Maharani in 2019?". The research design used a qualitative research design that was descriptive with research data using commentary data. This study used transcription techniques and note-taking techniques. The results showed that the highest number of utterances was 300 utterances containing hate speech, nine forms of hate speech were obtained. Of the nine forms of hate speech that were considered to be the style of speech that was widely used by the public in conveying comments on social media. The form of the utterance was a form of hate speech, as much as 96.67% of assertive speech acts.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/seloka/article/view/61794</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/seloka.v12i1.61794</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia; Vol 11 No 3 (2022): December 2022; 265-274</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4493</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2301-6744</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/seloka.v11i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/seloka/article/view/61794/23169</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>