Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Pneumatic positioning control system using constrained model predictive controller: Experimental repeatability test

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 11 No. 5 (2021)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v11i5.pp3913-3923
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2021-10-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Most of the controllers that were proposed to control the pneumatic positioning system did not consider the limitations or constraints of the system in their algorithms. Non-compliance with the prescribed system constraints may damage the pneumatic components and adversely affect its positioning accuracy, especially when the system is controlled in real-time environment. Model predictive controller (MPC) is one of the predictive controllers that is able to consider the constraint of the system in its algorithm. Therefore, constrained MPC (CMPC) was proposed in this study to improve the accuracy of pneumatic positioning system while considering the constraints of the system. The mathematical model of pneumatic system was determined by system identification technique and the control signal to the valves were considered as the constraints of the pneumatic system when developing the controller. In order to verify the accuracy and reliability of CMPC, repetitive experiments on the CMPC strategy was implemented. The existing predictive controller, that was used to control the pneumatic system such as predictive functional control (PFC), was also compared. The experimental results revealed that CMPC effectively improved the position accuracy of the pneumatic system compared to PFC strategy. However, CMPC not capable to provide a fast response as PFC.

Collaboration network of the authors

37 authors · 134 co-authorship links · 35 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • Universiti Malaysia Perlis
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sy Najib Sy SalimUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka6
Abdulrahman A.A. EmhemedUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
Rosbi MamatUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
Mohd Ridzuan JoharyUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
Siti Fatimaah SulaimanAffiliation unknown4
A. R. AziraUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka4
Khalil Azha Mohd AnnuarUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Mohd Firdaus Mohd Ab HalimUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Mohd Badril Nor ShahUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Zool Hilmi IsmailUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Noorhazirah SunarUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Shamsul Anuar SamsudinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Siti Marhainis OthmanUniversiti Malaysia Perlis2
Sahazati Md RozaliUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Zulfatman HasUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang2
Sani Irwan Md SalimUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Yewguan SooUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
N. A. A. HadiUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Lim Hui YeeUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Zulhilmi bin ZaidUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Z. A. GhaniUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Norfahaniza ZailanyUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Arman Hadi AzaharUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Muhamad Haniff HarunUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Muhammad Faizal YaakubAffiliation unknown1
Syed Najib Syed SalimUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
L. AbdullahUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Shamsul Anuar ShamsudinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Maslan ZainonUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
A. F. M. AminAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Pneumatic positioning control system using constrained model predictive controller: Experimental repeatability test</dc:title><dc:creator>Sulaiman, Siti Fatimah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rahmat, M. F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Faudzi, Ahmad Athif</dc:creator><dc:creator>Osman, Khairuddin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Samsudin, S. I.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Z. Abidin, A. F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sulaiman, Noor Asyikin</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Most of the controllers that were proposed to control the pneumatic positioning system did not consider the limitations or constraints of the system in their algorithms. Non-compliance with the prescribed system constraints may damage the pneumatic components and adversely affect its positioning accuracy, especially when the system is controlled in real-time environment. Model predictive controller (MPC) is one of the predictive controllers that is able to consider the constraint of the system in its algorithm. Therefore, constrained MPC (CMPC) was proposed in this study to improve the accuracy of pneumatic positioning system while considering the constraints of the system. The mathematical model of pneumatic system was determined by system identification technique and the control signal to the valves were considered as the constraints of the pneumatic system when developing the controller. In order to verify the accuracy and reliability of CMPC, repetitive experiments on the CMPC strategy was implemented. The existing predictive controller, that was used to control the pneumatic system such as predictive functional control (PFC), was also compared. The experimental results revealed that CMPC effectively improved the position accuracy of the pneumatic system compared to PFC strategy. However, CMPC not capable to provide a fast response as PFC.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021-10-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i5.pp3913-3923</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v11i5.pp3913-3923</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 11 No 5 (2021); 3913</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/25236/15034</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>