Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Performance Evaluation of Distributed Lag, Autoencoder, and LSTM Autoencoder Methods in Detecting Anomalies in Simulated Data Based on Air Quality Index in Jakarta

Scientific Journal of Informatics · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 373–390

DOI
10.15294/sji.v13i2.45581
ISSN
2407-7658, 2460-0040
Terbit
2026-05-03
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Purpose: This study evaluates the performance of distributed lag, autoencoder, and LSTM autoencoder methods in detecting point anomalies in simulated data generated from Jakarta's Air Quality Index (AQI). The evaluation is conducted across several simulation scenarios that represent factors that may influence anomaly detection performance. Methods: Simulation scenarios were constructed by varying two anomaly characteristics: anomaly percentage (0.3%, 0.5%, and 1.0%) and anomaly depth (4.4σ, 4.7σ, and 5.0σ), yielding 90 datasets generated via repeated experiments. Anomaly detection was performed using a forecasting-based approach with a 4σ threshold on prediction errors. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for forecasting accuracy and balanced accuracy for anomaly detection. Result: Increasing anomaly percentage significantly degrades both forecasting and anomaly detection performance across all methods. In contrast, anomaly depth has no significant effect on forecasting accuracy but strongly influences detection performance. Among the evaluated methods, the distributed lag model consistently shows the most robust anomaly detection performance across scenarios, outperforming the autoencoder and LSTM autoencoder, particularly at higher anomaly percentages and depths. Novelty: This study introduces a more rigorous and structured evaluation framework for anomaly detection by integrating three key contributions. First, it provides a unified comparison of distributed lag, autoencoder, and LSTM autoencoder methods within a single experimental setting, a limitation in prior studies. Second, it employs a controlled simulation design that systematically varies the anomaly percentage and depth while preserving key characteristics of empirical AQI data, enabling a more objective assessment of model performance across diverse anomaly conditions. Third, it uses ANOVA and interaction analysis to formally examine the effects of anomaly characteristics on both forecasting and detection performance, moving beyond purely descriptive comparisons commonly used in previous research.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 201 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 9 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • IPB University
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
  • Pakuan University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Khairil Anwar NotodiputroIPB University12
Laily Nissa Atul MualifahIPB University7
Anwar FitriantoIPB University4
Aji Hamim WigenaIPB University3
Farit Mochamad AfendiIPB University3
Muhammad Rizky NurhambaliIPB University2
Utami Dyah SyafitriIPB University2
Asep SaefuddinIPB University2
Fatma Hilali Moh’dIPB University2
Erdanisa Aghnia IlmaniIPB University2
Teguh PrasetyoIPB University1
Rizki Alifah PutriIPB University1
Dini RamadhaniIPB University1
Dhiya Khalishah Tsany SuwarsoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Akbar RizkiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Salsabila Dwi RahmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hakim Zoelva MahesaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Windi GunawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zafira Ilma FitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adelia PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Rizky NurhambaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dhiya Khalishah Tsany SuwarsoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Akbar RizkiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Salsabila Dwi RahmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hakim Zoelva MahesaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Windi GunawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zafira Ilma FitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adelia PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik DjuraidahIPB University1
Ismah IsmahUniversitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta1
Faula ArinaSultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1
Anggita Rizky FadilahIPB University1
Kusman SadikIPB University1
Embay RohaetiPakuan University1
Wiwik Andriyani Lestari NingsihIPB University1
Vivin Nur AzizaIPB University1
Firda Aulia MaghfirohIPB University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/sji/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Performance Evaluation of Distributed Lag, Autoencoder, and LSTM Autoencoder Methods in Detecting Anomalies in Simulated Data Based on Air Quality Index in Jakarta</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Angraini, Yenni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pangestika, Adelia Putri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sumertajaya, I Made</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Air Quality Index</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Anomaly Detection</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Autoencoder</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Distributed Lag</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">LSTM Autoencoder</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Purpose: This study evaluates the performance of distributed lag, autoencoder, and LSTM autoencoder methods in detecting point anomalies in simulated data generated from Jakarta's Air Quality Index (AQI). The evaluation is conducted across several simulation scenarios that represent factors that may influence anomaly detection performance.
Methods: Simulation scenarios were constructed by varying two anomaly characteristics: anomaly percentage (0.3%, 0.5%, and 1.0%) and anomaly depth (4.4σ, 4.7σ, and 5.0σ), yielding 90 datasets generated via repeated experiments. Anomaly detection was performed using a forecasting-based approach with a 4σ threshold on prediction errors. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for forecasting accuracy and balanced accuracy for anomaly detection.
Result: Increasing anomaly percentage significantly degrades both forecasting and anomaly detection performance across all methods. In contrast, anomaly depth has no significant effect on forecasting accuracy but strongly influences detection performance. Among the evaluated methods, the distributed lag model consistently shows the most robust anomaly detection performance across scenarios, outperforming the autoencoder and LSTM autoencoder, particularly at higher anomaly percentages and depths.
Novelty: This study introduces a more rigorous and structured evaluation framework for anomaly detection by integrating three key contributions. First, it provides a unified comparison of distributed lag, autoencoder, and LSTM autoencoder methods within a single experimental setting, a limitation in prior studies. Second, it employs a controlled simulation design that systematically varies the anomaly percentage and depth while preserving key characteristics of empirical AQI data, enabling a more objective assessment of model performance across diverse anomaly conditions. Third, it uses ANOVA and interaction analysis to formally examine the effects of anomaly characteristics on both forecasting and detection performance, moving beyond purely descriptive comparisons commonly used in previous research.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-05-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/sji/article/view/45581</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/sji.v13i2.45581</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Scientific Journal of Informatics; Vol. 13 No. 2: Regular Issue; 373-390</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2407-7658</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-0040</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/sji.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/sji/article/view/45581/9505</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Informatics</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>