Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Comparison of cascade P-PI controller tuning methods for PMDC motor based on intelligence techniques

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v12i1.pp1-11
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2022-02-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

In this paper, there are two contributions: The first contribution is to design a robust cascade P-PI controller to control the speed and position of the permanent magnet DC motor (PMDC). The second contribution is to use three methods to tuning the parameter values for this cascade controller by making a comparison between them to obtain the best results to ensure accurate tracking trajectory on the axis to reach the desired position. These methods are the classical method (CM) and it requires some assumptions, the genetic algorithm (GA), and the particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO). The simulation results show the system becomes unstable after applying the load when using the classical method because it assumes cancellation of the load effect. Also, an overshoot of about 3.763% is observed, and a deviation from the desired position of about 12.03 degrees is observed when using the GA algorithm, while no deviation or overshoot is observed when using the PSO algorithm. Therefore, the PSO algorithm has superiority as compared to the other two methods in improving the performance of the PMDC motor by extracting the best parameters for the cascade P-PI controller to reach the desired position at a regular speed.

Collaboration network of the authors

8 authors · 14 co-authorship links · 5 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Middle Technical University
  • University of Information Technology and Communications
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nadhir Ibrahim AbdulkhaleqUniversity of Information Technology and Communications2
Faeza Abbas AbedMiddle Technical University1
Falah Hasan MahdiMiddle Technical University1
Bushra Mahmoud WaheibMiddle Technical University1
Nahla Abdul Jalil SalihMiddle Technical University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Comparison of cascade P-PI controller tuning methods for PMDC motor based on intelligence techniques</dc:title><dc:creator>Abdulhussein, Kareem Ghazi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yasin, Naseer Majeed</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hasan, Ihsan Jabbar</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;In this paper, there are two contributions: The first contribution is to design a robust cascade P-PI controller to control the speed and position of the permanent magnet DC motor (PMDC). The second contribution is to use three methods to tuning the parameter values for this cascade controller by making a comparison between them to obtain the best results to ensure accurate tracking trajectory on the axis to reach the desired position. These methods are the classical method (CM) and it requires some assumptions, the genetic algorithm (GA), and the particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO). The simulation results show the system becomes unstable after applying the load when using the classical method because it assumes cancellation of the load effect. Also, an overshoot of about 3.763% is observed, and a deviation from the desired position of about 12.03 degrees is observed when using the GA algorithm, while no deviation or overshoot is observed when using the PSO algorithm. Therefore, the PSO algorithm has superiority as compared to the other two methods in improving the performance of the PMDC motor by extracting the best parameters for the cascade P-PI controller to reach the desired position at a regular speed.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2022-02-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i1.pp1-11</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v12i1.pp1-11</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 12 No 1 (2022); 1</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/24643/15340</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>