Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Misconceptions Analysis of Regulatory System Materials Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instruments

Journal of Biology Education · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 136–144

DOI
10.15294/jbe.v10i2.42495
ISSN
2540-833X, 2252-6579
Terbit
2021-07-19
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The results of the 2018 PISA survey showed a decrease in the quality ranking of Indonesian education, so it is necessary to evaluate the difficulties of students in learning. One of the difficulties encountered is that students are unable to understand concepts precisely or misconceptions as agreed by scientists. Student misconceptions need to be identified because it will have a bad impact on students, one of which is low learning outcomes. This study aims to analyze the profile of grade XI students' misconceptions on regulatory system material with a four-tier diagnostic test instrument. The samples of this study were students of Class XI MIPA 1, XI MIPA 2, XI MIPA 3, and XI MIPA 4 SMA Negeri 2 Semarang with a total of 143 students. This type of research is descriptive research with non-experimental quantitative methods. The four-tier diagnostic test instrument in this study consisted of 20 items. Each question has four levels of answers; At the first level, there are four choices of answers and one choice of open answers, the second level is the level of confidence, at the third level there are four choices of reasons and one choice of open reasons, and the fourth level is the level of confidence. The results of the misconception analysis of SMA Negeri 2 Semarang students showed that 25% of the misconceptions were in the low category. Of the 4 types of combination answers to misconceptions, type 1 was 52%; type 2 at 3,5%; type 3 at 5,5%; and type 4 as much as 39% of the total 685 answers that fall into the misconception category. In general, the causes of student misconceptions are student assumption, lack of literacy, and lack of time to study.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 88 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Supriyanto .Afiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nur Kusuma DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang2
Aditya MariantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Siti AlimahState University of Semarang2
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang1
okvita sariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nana Kariada Tri MartutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Herlina OktavianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pramesti DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Stella FlorensiaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Destia Ayu Kusuma WardaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nazlafatin HamidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lu'lu'atul JannahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurul Holisa NurulAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Laily Mu'ayadahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kukuh SantosaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur ZubaidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ika - MustikasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Irma ParamitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arif Rahman HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andin IrsadiState University of Semarang1
Alaina MawadahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Desinta Dwi NuriyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andreas Priyono Budi PrasetyoState University of Semarang1
Evin Rusdiana SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Titik WidayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tyas Agung PribadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfa WafdaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Una Lailis TsaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dewi MustikaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aulia Nur LitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang1
Muspita DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kurniahtunnisa KurniahtunnisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agung Budi SantosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Fitria RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kasih FitrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Misconceptions Analysis of Regulatory System Materials Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instruments</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rahmatika, Atik Yusni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Utami, Nur Rahayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The results of the 2018 PISA survey showed a decrease in the quality ranking of Indonesian education, so it is necessary to evaluate the difficulties of students in learning. One of the difficulties encountered is that students are unable to understand concepts precisely or misconceptions as agreed by scientists. Student misconceptions need to be identified because it will have a bad impact on students, one of which is low learning outcomes. This study aims to analyze the profile of grade XI students' misconceptions on regulatory system material with a four-tier diagnostic test instrument. The samples of this study were students of Class XI MIPA 1, XI MIPA 2, XI MIPA 3, and XI MIPA 4 SMA Negeri 2 Semarang with a total of 143 students. This type of research is descriptive research with non-experimental quantitative methods. The four-tier diagnostic test instrument in this study consisted of 20 items. Each question has four levels of answers; At the first level, there are four choices of answers and one choice of open answers, the second level is the level of confidence, at the third level there are four choices of reasons and one choice of open reasons, and the fourth level is the level of confidence. The results of the misconception analysis of SMA Negeri 2 Semarang students showed that 25% of the misconceptions were in the low category. Of the 4 types of combination answers to misconceptions, type 1 was 52%; type 2 at 3,5%; type 3 at 5,5%; and type 4 as much as 39% of the total 685 answers that fall into the misconception category. In general, the causes of student misconceptions are student assumption, lack of literacy, and lack of time to study.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-07-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/42495</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jbe.v10i2.42495</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Biology Education; Vol 10 No 2 (2021): August 2021; 136-144</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2540-833X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jbe.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/42495/19478</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Biology Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>