Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Ability of Biology Education Students in Arrange 2019 Revised Lesson Plan

Journal of Biology Education · Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023) · hlm. 248–256

DOI
10.15294/jbe.v12i2.53241
ISSN
2540-833X, 2252-6579
Terbit
2023-08-17
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Lesson plans serve as guidelines for teachers when managing classes. However, some teachers choose to use the previous school year's lesson plans or copy their colleagues' lesson plans, this is due to the very detailed preparation of the 2013 curriculum lesson plans. This is the background for the Minister of Education and Culture to issue Letter Number 14 of 2019 concerning Simplification of lesson plan into three main components, namely learning objectives, learning activities, and assessment.. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ability of Biology Education Students in arrange the 2019 Revised lesson plan. The research method used was descriptive quantitative with survey techniques. The research sample was 50 UNNES Biology Education Students. Instruments in the form of lesson plan assessment sheets and student response questionnaires. The results obtained are the ability of Biology Students in general is included in the very good category by 14%, in the good category by 10%, in the average category by 44%, in the low category by 28%, and in the very low by 4%. Biology Education Students are mostly in the average category of 22 students. The total of students in the very good, good, and average categories is 34 students with a minimum score of 79,2. Most of the Biology Education Students in preparing the 2019 Revised lesson plan (34 students) have been able to compose the lesson plan components, especially the lesson plan identity components, learning objectives, selection of learning media, learning steps, assessment, and good language in preparing lesson plan. Although there are some students who have general deficiencies in the time allocation component that is not included in the learning scenario, learning resources that only use textbooks, lesson plans do not bring students closer to interacting with the environment, evaluations do not include remedial and enrichment programs, and assessment attachments are sometimes missed. The results of the student response questionnaires became crosscheck to determine the level of student knowledge.The result of learning objective percentage of 91.2%, an assessment of 90.8%, an evaluation of 89.2%, preparation and guidelines lesson plan 87.6%, learning steps 86.4%, basic knowledge about the differences between the 2013 Curriculum lesson plan and the 2019 Revised lesson plan 85.36%, knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of lesson plan 84.13%. The concluision is most (34 students) Biology Education Students have been able to prepare the 2019 Revised lesson plan highest achievement is 99 and the lowest achievement is 68. The results of the student response questionnaire generally show that Biology Education students are good at understanding the arrange of the 2019 lesson plan.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 120 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Lisdiana LisdianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ari YuniastutiState University of Semarang3
LisdianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
R SusantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Edy CahyonoState University of Semarang2
Dante AlighiriState University of Semarang2
Tri HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Adrian Maulana ZakyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sabila AisyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bella PermatasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Revinta Nur Aulia RochlyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wulan ChristijantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bagus Hammam FalahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Risma Romaulina SimarmataAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isti FadahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endah PeniatiState University of Semarang1
Addina Nur LuthfianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sausan Inas AfaninAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eny SusantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mutiara Diah NisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nirmala Al FatiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Khoerina SalwaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Didik Huswo UtomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Saffanah Binti Mohd Ab AzidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Djuna LamondoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisaa BasarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mirtaati NaimahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yofi Ersyada DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia Wilda AuliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitria SalsabilaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Priyantini WidiyaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alif Khoirur RohmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Valentina Yentina Simatupang Valentina Yentina SimatupangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Reefa QudsiyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dina Nafisa PuspitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dyah Rini IndriyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arum SubektiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anna SyarifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Ability of Biology Education Students in Arrange 2019 Revised Lesson Plan</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Janah, Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>WH, Nugrahaningsih</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Lesson plans serve as guidelines for teachers when managing classes. However, some teachers choose to use the previous school year's lesson plans or copy their colleagues' lesson plans, this is due to the very detailed preparation of the 2013 curriculum lesson plans. This is the background for the Minister of Education and Culture to issue Letter Number 14 of 2019 concerning Simplification of lesson plan into three main components, namely learning objectives, learning activities, and assessment.. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ability of Biology Education Students in arrange the 2019 Revised lesson plan. The research method used was descriptive quantitative with survey techniques. The research sample was 50 UNNES Biology Education Students. Instruments in the form of lesson plan assessment sheets and student response questionnaires. The results obtained are the ability of Biology Students in general is included in the very good category by 14%, in the good category by 10%, in the average category by 44%, in the low category by 28%, and in the very low by 4%. Biology Education Students are mostly in the average category of 22 students. The total of students in the very good, good, and average categories is 34 students with a minimum score of 79,2. Most of the Biology Education Students in preparing the 2019 Revised lesson plan (34 students) have been able to compose the lesson plan components, especially the lesson plan identity components, learning objectives, selection of learning media, learning steps, assessment, and good language in preparing lesson plan. Although there are some students who have general deficiencies in the time allocation component that is not included in the learning scenario, learning resources that only use textbooks, lesson plans do not bring students closer to interacting with the environment, evaluations do not include remedial and enrichment programs, and assessment attachments are sometimes missed. The results of the student response questionnaires became crosscheck to determine the level of student knowledge .The result of learning objective percentage of 91.2%, an assessment of 90.8%, an evaluation of 89.2%, preparation and guidelines lesson plan 87.6%, learning steps 86.4%, basic knowledge about the differences between the 2013 Curriculum lesson plan and the 2019 Revised lesson plan 85.36%, knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of lesson plan 84.13%. The concluision&amp;nbsp; is&amp;nbsp; most (34 students) Biology Education Students have been able to prepare the 2019 Revised lesson plan highest achievement is 99 and the lowest achievement is 68. The results of the student response questionnaire generally show that Biology Education students are good at understanding the arrange of the 2019 lesson plan.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-08-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/53241</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jbe.v12i2.53241</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Biology Education; Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Agustus 2023; 248 - 256</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2540-833X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jbe.v12i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/53241/25002</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Biology Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>