Jurnal
The Ability of Biology Education Students in Arrange 2019 Revised Lesson Plan
Journal of Biology Education · Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023) · hlm. 248–256
- ISSN
- 2540-833X, 2252-6579
- Terbit
- 2023-08-17
- Penerbit
- Universitas Negeri Semarang
- Bahasa
- eng
Abstrak
Lesson plans serve as guidelines for teachers when managing classes. However, some teachers choose to use the previous school year's lesson plans or copy their colleagues' lesson plans, this is due to the very detailed preparation of the 2013 curriculum lesson plans. This is the background for the Minister of Education and Culture to issue Letter Number 14 of 2019 concerning Simplification of lesson plan into three main components, namely learning objectives, learning activities, and assessment.. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ability of Biology Education Students in arrange the 2019 Revised lesson plan. The research method used was descriptive quantitative with survey techniques. The research sample was 50 UNNES Biology Education Students. Instruments in the form of lesson plan assessment sheets and student response questionnaires. The results obtained are the ability of Biology Students in general is included in the very good category by 14%, in the good category by 10%, in the average category by 44%, in the low category by 28%, and in the very low by 4%. Biology Education Students are mostly in the average category of 22 students. The total of students in the very good, good, and average categories is 34 students with a minimum score of 79,2. Most of the Biology Education Students in preparing the 2019 Revised lesson plan (34 students) have been able to compose the lesson plan components, especially the lesson plan identity components, learning objectives, selection of learning media, learning steps, assessment, and good language in preparing lesson plan. Although there are some students who have general deficiencies in the time allocation component that is not included in the learning scenario, learning resources that only use textbooks, lesson plans do not bring students closer to interacting with the environment, evaluations do not include remedial and enrichment programs, and assessment attachments are sometimes missed. The results of the student response questionnaires became crosscheck to determine the level of student knowledge.The result of learning objective percentage of 91.2%, an assessment of 90.8%, an evaluation of 89.2%, preparation and guidelines lesson plan 87.6%, learning steps 86.4%, basic knowledge about the differences between the 2013 Curriculum lesson plan and the 2019 Revised lesson plan 85.36%, knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of lesson plan 84.13%. The concluision is most (34 students) Biology Education Students have been able to prepare the 2019 Revised lesson plan highest achievement is 99 and the lowest achievement is 68. The results of the student response questionnaire generally show that Biology Education students are good at understanding the arrange of the 2019 lesson plan.
Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis
40 penulis · 120 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung
Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.
- State University of Semarang
- Afiliasi tidak diketahui
- Organisasi berbeda
- Organisasi sama
- Afiliasi tidak diketahui
- Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
| Rekan penulis | Organisasi | Artikel bersama |
|---|---|---|
| Lisdiana Lisdiana | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 4 |
| Ari Yuniastuti | State University of Semarang | 3 |
| Lisdiana | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 3 |
| R Susanti | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 2 |
| Edy Cahyono | State University of Semarang | 2 |
| Dante Alighiri | State University of Semarang | 2 |
| Tri Handayani | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 2 |
| Adrian Maulana Zaky | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 2 |
| Sabila Aisyah | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 2 |
| Bella Permatasari | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 2 |
| Revinta Nur Aulia Rochly | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Wulan Christijanti | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Bagus Hammam Falah | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Risma Romaulina Simarmata | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Isti Fadah | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Endah Peniati | State University of Semarang | 1 |
| Addina Nur Luthfiani | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Sausan Inas Afanin | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Eny Susanti | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Mutiara Diah Nisa | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Nirmala Al Fatiah | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Khoerina Salwa | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Didik Huswo Utomo | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Saffanah Binti Mohd Ab Azid | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Djuna Lamondo | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Annisaa Basar | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Mirtaati Naimah | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Yofi Ersyada Damayanti | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Amalia Wilda Aulia | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Fitria Salsabila | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Priyantini Widiyaningrum | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Alif Khoirur Rohman | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Valentina Yentina Simatupang Valentina Yentina Simatupang | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Reefa Qudsiya | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Dina Nafisa Puspitasari | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Dyah Rini Indriyanti | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Arum Subekti | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
| Anna Syarifah | Afiliasi tidak diketahui | 1 |
Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.