Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat

Unnes Law Journal · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 23–46

DOI
10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38704
ISSN
2252-6536
Terbit
2021-04-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The purpose of this research is to (1) analyze the Supreme Court's consideration of victims of the spread of sordid chatter in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018, and (2) analyze the arguments of the Public Prosecutor regarding the offense Article 27 paragraph (1) juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. This type of research uses qualitative methods with a normative juridical approach. In this method, secondary data uses the decision of the Mataram District Court Number: 265 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.MTR and the decision of the Supreme Court Number 574 K / Pid.Sus / 2018. Primary data to support this research were obtained from interviews of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Institute for Criminal Justie Reform. Results and discussion of research (1) The values ​​underlying the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018 and (2) the Prosecutor's argument The Public Prosecutor related to offense Article 27 paragraph (1) jo Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in the decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. Overall it can be concluded that (1) The value underlying the Supreme Court in passing this decision is that the judge tries to apply the benefits of the law. (2) The Public Prosecutor's Arguments in indicting or in prosecution cannot describe the offenses that are charged to the defendant, this is a serious record in the first-level court of the indictment and the demands of the Public Prosecutor are declared unproven on the defendant.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 112 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 30 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Satya Wacana Christian University
  • Walisongo State Islamic University
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Kathmandu University
  • Universitas Pelita Bangsa
  • Universitas Tangerang Raya
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ridwan ArifinState University of Semarang5
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang5
Muhammad Azil MaskurState University of Semarang5
Anis WidyawatiState University of Semarang4
Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad SabriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rohadhatul AisyState University of Semarang3
Aprila NiravitaState University of Semarang2
‪Eram Tunggul Pawenang‬State University of Semarang2
Wahyudi WahyudiSatya Wacana Christian University2
Syatriawan LaguraState University of Semarang2
Nadela JusticeaState University of Semarang2
Juniza Indah SetiawatiState University of Semarang2
Moh SamanState University of Semarang2
Muhammad Hilmi Naufal AflahState University of Semarang2
Diyah Anggun FebriyantiState University of Semarang2
Bayyinatun AfifahState University of Semarang2
Rodiyah RodiyahState University of Semarang2
Ali MurtadhoWalisongo State Islamic University2
Indah Sri UtariState University of Semarang2
Salsabila TriandaniState University of Semarang1
Windiahsari WindiahsariNational Cheng Kung University1
Rizqan NaelufarState University of Semarang1
Puji AstutiState University of Semarang1
Zulfa SakhiyyaState University of Semarang1
Fahrur RoziState University of Semarang1
Heru SaputraState University of Semarang1
Dolendra PaudelKathmandu University1
Muhammad Haidar GhoniState University of Semarang1
Wahyu ZulzamanState University of Semarang1
Arini SalsabilaState University of Semarang1
Trias SaputraUniversitas Pelita Bangsa1
Rahmiati RahmiatiUniversitas Tangerang Raya1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Wahyu AlfakarState University of Semarang1
Ngboawaji Daniel NteNovena University1
Bagus Hendradi KusumaState University of Semarang1
Muhammad MaskurDiponegoro University1
Rodiyah RodiyahState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ulj/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Cipta, Rachmadan Eka</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Masyhar, Ali</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Punishment, Immoral Chat, Victim of Crime, Victimology</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The purpose of this research is to (1) analyze the Supreme Court's consideration of victims of the spread of sordid chatter in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018, and (2) analyze the arguments of the Public Prosecutor regarding the offense Article 27 paragraph (1) juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. This type of research uses qualitative methods with a normative juridical approach. In this method, secondary data uses the decision of the Mataram District Court Number: 265 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.MTR and the decision of the Supreme Court Number 574 K / Pid.Sus / 2018. Primary data to support this research were obtained from interviews of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Institute for Criminal Justie Reform. Results and discussion of research (1) The values ​​underlying the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018 and (2) the Prosecutor's argument The Public Prosecutor related to offense Article 27 paragraph (1) jo Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in the decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. Overall it can be concluded that (1) The value underlying the Supreme Court in passing this decision is that the judge tries to apply the benefits of the law. (2) The Public Prosecutor's Arguments in indicting or in prosecution cannot describe the offenses that are charged to the defendant, this is a serious record in the first-level court of the indictment and the demands of the Public Prosecutor are declared unproven on the defendant.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ulj/article/view/38704</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38704</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Unnes Law Journal; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): April, 2021; 23-46</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6536</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ulj.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ulj/article/view/38704/7565</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>