Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Instrumen Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran Fisika: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis berbasis Scopus Menggunakan Kerangka PRISMA (2010-2025)

Unnes Physics Education Journal · Vol. 14 No. Special (2026) · hlm. 387–418

DOI
10.15294/upej.v14i3.38319
ISSN
2503-2313, 2252-6935
Terbit
2026-03-07
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Research on diagnostic instruments in physics education has grown significantly in recent years; however, a comprehensive mapping of research trends, methodological characteristics, and research gaps based on international databases is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the development and application of diagnostic instruments in physics education in the range of 2010 to 2025 using publications indexed by Scopus. A total of 36 articles that met the criteria were analyzed following the PRISMA framework to identify trends, methodological characteristics, and research gaps. The findings show that four-tier diagnostic tests dominate this field (50%), followed by three-tier instruments (22%), reflecting a shift toward more comprehensive assessments that evaluate students’ answers, reasoning, and confidence levels simultaneously. Research topics mostly focus on mechanics, heat, and electricity, while modern physics and advanced concepts are still rarely explored. Most studies used analysis based on Classical Test Theory (91.6%) for validation, with limited adoption of Rasch modeling and Item Response Theory. Study participants were dominated by college students (50%) and high school students (44%), who showed minimal attention to vocational students and active teachers. Furthermore, paper-based formats still dominate despite increasing interest in digital and adaptive assessments. In conclusion, these findings provide a comprehensive overview of research trends in diagnostic instruments within physics education and highlight several research gaps that may inform the development of technology-based diagnostic assessments and the adoption of modern psychometric approaches in future studies.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

38 penulis · 97 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 40 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • State University of Semarang
  • University of Szeged
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya
  • Universitas Nurul Huda
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Jumadi JumadiYogyakarta State University5
İnsih WilujengYogyakarta State University4
Moh. Irma SukarelawanUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan3
Anggi Datiatur RahmatYogyakarta State University2
Dwi AstutiState University of Semarang2
Soeharto SoehartoUniversity of Szeged1
Fitri Nur HikmahUniversitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin1
Aulia Hermawati UlfahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyu PamungkasYogyakarta State University1
Hanif Alifah KurniawatiYogyakarta State University1
Febyarni KimiantiYogyakarta State University1
Suyitno AloysiusYogyakarta State University1
Paidi PaidiYogyakarta State University1
Ratna Dyah HartantiYogyakarta State University1
Rifqi RasisYogyakarta State University1
Elisabeth PratidhinaUniversitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya1
Dwi SulisworoUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan1
Siti Anisatur RofiqahUniversitas Nurul Huda1
Mundilarto MundilartoYogyakarta State University1
Yeni Ristya WardaniYogyakarta State University1
Eka SobiatinYogyakarta State University1
Herianto HeriantoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nur KhosiyatunYogyakarta State University1
Mirra FatharaniMonash University1
Nurul Fitriyah SulaemanMulawarman University1
Dwi Ulan RahmawatiYogyakarta State University1
Sabila YasarohYogyakarta State University1
Desi RamadhantiYogyakarta State University1
Aisha AzaliaYogyakarta State University1
Hestiana HestianaYogyakarta State University1
Arshi AlfiantiYogyakarta State University1
Wipsar Sunu Brams DwandaruYogyakarta State University1
Ahmad TaufiqState University of Malang1
Duwi SusantoYogyakarta State University1
Arina Fauza MachshuniyaYogyakarta State University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/upej/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Instrumen Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran Fisika: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis berbasis Scopus Menggunakan Kerangka PRISMA (2010-2025)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ramadhan, Gilang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Supahar </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kuswanto, Heru</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Diagnostic instruments</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Physics education</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Misconceptions</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Systematic Literature Review</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Research on diagnostic instruments in physics education has grown significantly in recent years; however, a comprehensive mapping of research trends, methodological characteristics, and research gaps based on international databases is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the development and application of diagnostic instruments in physics education in the range of 2010 to 2025 using publications indexed by Scopus. A total of 36 articles that met the criteria were analyzed following the PRISMA framework to identify trends, methodological characteristics, and research gaps. The findings show that four-tier diagnostic tests dominate this field (50%), followed by three-tier instruments (22%), reflecting a shift toward more comprehensive assessments that evaluate students’ answers, reasoning, and confidence levels simultaneously. Research topics mostly focus on mechanics, heat, and electricity, while modern physics and advanced concepts are still rarely explored. Most studies used analysis based on Classical Test Theory (91.6%) for validation, with limited adoption of Rasch modeling and Item Response Theory. Study participants were dominated by college students (50%) and high school students (44%), who showed minimal attention to vocational students and active teachers. Furthermore, paper-based formats still dominate despite increasing interest in digital and adaptive assessments. In conclusion, these findings provide a comprehensive overview of research trends in diagnostic instruments within physics education and highlight several research gaps that may inform the development of technology-based diagnostic assessments and the adoption of modern psychometric approaches in future studies.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-03-07</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/upej/article/view/38319</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/upej.v14i3.38319</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Unnes Physics Education Journal; Vol. 14 No. Special Issue (3) (2025); 387-418</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-2313</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6935</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/upej.v14i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/upej/article/view/38319/8924</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>