Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Kajian Kurikulum Pendidikan Fisika dalam Membekali Kreativitas Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika

Unnes Physics Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020) · hlm. 117–128

DOI
10.15294/upej.v9i2.41917
ISSN
2503-2313, 2252-6935
Terbit
2020-10-18
Penerbit
UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Research aims to reveal design of Unnes Physics Education Curriculum related to development of student abilities who lead to creativity and learning in train student creativity who carried out based on the Unnes Physics Education Curriculum. The research method uses descriptive analysis with a quantitative-qualitative approach. The study used triangulation techniques. CPL and CPMK in the 2015 Physics Education Curriculum as samples of documentation method analysis related to train student creativity and interviews to students and distribution questionnaires to find out the level of students creativity. The results of the analysis show the Achievement of Graduate Learning (CPL) and Achievement of Course Learning (CPMK) of curriculum design has a very high creativity criteria with a percentage of 81%. These results are different from interviews result and research questionnaires which show that the implementation of the 2015 Physics Education Curriculum has not been maximized in equipping the creativity of physics education students at the highest level of creativity. It was stated that the results of the average percentage of questionnaires were 68% with high creativity criteria, and interviews were 52% with moderate creativity criteria. The results of the T-test obtained the Sig. (0.002) < 0.05 which indicates a significant difference between the level of student creativity in the field and the level of creativity in the 2015 Physics Education Curriculum design.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 150 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang5
Ian YuliantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Tri Joko RaharjoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang3
Sarwi SarwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Susilo SusiloState University of Semarang3
Listiyanto ListiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fitri NurdianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Diah Nur FitriasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rahayu PangestutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Harianingsih HarianingsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Imam SumponoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Khumaedi KhumaediAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Alvian AlvianAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang2
Nurbaya NurbayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanida ListianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang1
Melissa Salma DarmawanState University of Semarang1
Fidia FibrianaState University of Semarang1
Dyah Rini IndriyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Natalia Erna SetyaningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Leni VannesaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tri SuminarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rusdarti RusdartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bunyamin BunyaminState University of Semarang1
Indra Sakti PangestuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aris DwiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Akhmad SyaikhoniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nila Prasetya AriyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Natalia Erna SeytaningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Toni WahyudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ellianawati E.Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rene Babiera Babiera IIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ayomi FatwaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cintia Agtasia PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Kajian Kurikulum Pendidikan Fisika dalam Membekali Kreativitas Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Ubud, Emha Hasiba</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Edie, Sukiswo Supeni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Subali, Bambang</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Research aims to reveal design of Unnes Physics Education Curriculum related to development of student abilities who lead to creativity and learning in train student creativity who carried out based on the Unnes Physics Education Curriculum. The research method uses descriptive analysis with a quantitative-qualitative approach. The study used triangulation techniques. CPL and CPMK in the 2015 Physics Education Curriculum as samples of documentation method analysis related to train student creativity and interviews to students and distribution questionnaires to find out the level of students creativity. The results of the analysis show the Achievement of Graduate Learning (CPL) and Achievement of Course Learning (CPMK) of curriculum design has a very high creativity criteria with a percentage of 81%. These results are different from interviews result and research questionnaires which show that the implementation of the 2015 Physics Education Curriculum has not been maximized in equipping the creativity of physics education students at the highest level of creativity. It was stated that the results of the average percentage of questionnaires were 68% with high creativity criteria, and interviews were 52% with moderate creativity criteria. The results of the T-test obtained the Sig. (0.002) &amp;lt; 0.05 which indicates a significant difference between the level of student creativity in the field and the level of creativity in the 2015 Physics Education Curriculum design.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-10-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/41917</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/upej.v9i2.41917</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal; Vol 9 No 2 (2020); 117-128</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-2313</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6935</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/41917/17119</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 UPEJ   Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>