Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

A predictive sliding mode control for quadrotor’s trackingtrajectory subject to wind gusts and uncertainties

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 12 No. 5 (2022)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v12i5.pp4861-4875
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2022-10-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

In this paper, a predictive sliding mode control (PSMC) strategy for the quadrotors tracking trajectory problem is proposed. This strategy aims to combine the advantages of sliding mode control (SMC) and non-linear model predictive control (NMPC) to improve the tracking control performance for quadrotors in terms of optimality, inputs/states constraints satisfaction, and strong robustness against disturbances. A comparative study of three popular controllers: the SMC, NMPC, and the integral backstepping control (IBC) is performed with different criteria. Accordingly, IBC and SMC show less computational time and strong robustness, while NMPC has minimum control effort. The discrete Dryden turbulence model is used as a benchmark model to represent the wind effect on the trajectory tracking accuracy. The effectiveness of the proposed method PSMC has been proven and compared with discrete-time slidingmode control (DSMC) and NMPC in several scenarios. Simulation results show that under both wind turbulence and time-variant uncertainties, the PSMC outperforms the other controllers by providing simultaneously disturbance rejection and guarantee that the control inputs are within bounded constraints.

Collaboration network of the authors

3 authors · 3 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Blida
  • King Saud University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>A predictive sliding mode control for quadrotor’s trackingtrajectory subject to wind gusts and uncertainties</dc:title><dc:creator>Meradi, Dounia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Benselama, Zoubir Abdeslem</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hedjar, Ramdane</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;In this paper, a predictive sliding mode control (PSMC) strategy for the quadrotors tracking trajectory problem is proposed. This strategy aims to combine the advantages of sliding mode control (SMC) and non-linear model predictive control (NMPC) to improve the tracking control performance for quadrotors in terms of optimality, inputs/states constraints satisfaction, and strong robustness against disturbances. A comparative study of three popular controllers: the SMC, NMPC, and the integral backstepping control (IBC) is performed with different criteria. Accordingly, IBC and SMC show less computational time and strong robustness, while NMPC has minimum control effort. The discrete Dryden turbulence model is used as a benchmark model to represent the wind effect on the trajectory tracking accuracy. The effectiveness of the proposed method PSMC has been proven and compared with discrete-time slidingmode control (DSMC) and NMPC in several scenarios. Simulation results show that under both wind turbulence and time-variant uncertainties, the PSMC outperforms the other controllers by providing simultaneously disturbance rejection and guarantee that the control inputs are within bounded constraints.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2022-10-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i5.pp4861-4875</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v12i5.pp4861-4875</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 12 No 5 (2022); 4861</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/27090/15913</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>