Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Ideational Meanings of Teachers' Utterances in Reading and Writing Classes

International Journal of Language Teaching and Education · Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018) · hlm. 275–285

DOI
10.22437/ijolte.v2i3.5689
ISSN
2598-2303, 2614-1191
Terbit
2018-12-01
Penerbit
Universitas Jambi, Magister Program of English Education Department
Bahasa
en

Abstrak

This study is aimed at describing the ideational meanings of teachers’ utterances in Reading and Writing classes. It reveals what processes, participants and circumstances are found in the teachers’ utterances. The data were taken from the Reading and Writing classes conducted at a university in Semarang city. The data were collected by video recording the teaching and learning processes in Reading and Writing classes, then they were analyzed by segmenting the utterances into clauses; identifying the process, participants, and circumstances; classifying the processes, participants and circumstances based on their type; and interpreting the data. The results showed that the processes mostly found in the teachers’ utterances in Reading class are relational ones with carrier and attribute as participants, the second are mental processes with senser and phenomenon as the participants, while in those of Writing class are material with actor and goal as participants and the second are relational with carrier and attribute as participants. Relational processes are dominant in Reading class because the teacher explained many terms or vocabularies found in the text to make the students really understand them. That material processes are dominant in Writing class is caused by the fact that in Writing class the teacher often asks the students to do some actions like writing or doing something.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 119 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 4 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Lampung University
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoState University of Semarang11
Sri Wuli FitriatiState University of Semarang9
Dwi RukminiState University of Semarang9
Abdurrachman FaridiState University of Semarang6
Djoko SutopoState University of Semarang6
Hendi PratamaState University of Semarang5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiState University of Semarang5
Rudi HartonoState University of Semarang4
Rudi HartonoState University of Semarang3
Abdurrahman FaridiState University of Semarang3
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoState University of Semarang3
Zulfa SakhiyyaState University of Semarang2
Rudi HartonoState University of Semarang2
Jumadi JumadiYogyakarta State University2
Astri ErvianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lukman Mohammad BagaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian KurniasariLampung University1
Zaenal MukhlisinLampung University1
Wamiliana WamilianaLampung University1
Moh. Akhdan Aufarizal IrhamiState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Zaid MuttaqinState University of Semarang1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiState University of Semarang1
Alief Noor FaridaState University of Semarang1
Pasca KalisaState University of Semarang1
Agus RohmahwatiState University of Semarang1
Ratna Widya IswaraState University of Semarang1
Oki SavyanandaruAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arif Arga KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Laila HafidhohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Miftakhul UlumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuni Awalaturrohmah SolihahState University of Semarang1
Sri Wuli FirtiatiState University of Semarang1
Firman WicaksonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
sigit sulistiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isti KristianiState University of Semarang1
Ratih OktavianiState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/IJoLTE/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Ideational Meanings of Teachers' Utterances in Reading and Writing Classes</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mulatsih, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Saleh, Mursid</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Warsono, Warsono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yuliasri, Issy</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study is aimed at describing the ideational meanings of teachers’ utterances&amp;nbsp; in Reading and Writing classes. It reveals what processes, participants and circumstances are found in the teachers’ utterances. The data were taken from the Reading and Writing classes conducted at a university in Semarang city. The data were collected by video recording the teaching and learning processes in Reading and Writing classes, then they were analyzed by segmenting the utterances into clauses; identifying the process, participants, and circumstances; classifying the processes, participants and circumstances based on their type; and interpreting the data. The results showed that the processes mostly found in the teachers’ utterances in&amp;nbsp; Reading class are relational ones &amp;nbsp;with carrier and attribute as participants, the second are mental processes with senser and phenomenon as the participants, &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;while in those of Writing class are material with actor and goal as participants and the second are&amp;nbsp; relational with carrier and attribute as participants. Relational processes are dominant in Reading class because the teacher explained many terms or vocabularies found in the text to make the students really understand them. That material processes are dominant in Writing class is caused by the fact that in Writing class the teacher often asks the students to do some actions like writing or doing something.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Jambi, Magister Program of English Education Department</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-12-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Research Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/IJoLTE/article/view/5689</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/ijolte.v2i3.5689</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">International Journal of Language Teaching and Education; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018): Volume 2, Issue 3, November 2018; 275-285</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-2303</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2614-1191</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/IJoLTE/article/view/5689/9123</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Language Teaching and Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>