Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Comparison analysis of different classification methods of power quality disturbances

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 12 No. 6 (2022)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v12i6.pp5754-5764
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Terbit
2022-12-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Good power quality delivery has always been in high demand in power system utilities where different types of power quality disturbances are the main obstacles. As these disturbances have distinct characteristics and even unique mitigation techniques, their detection and classification should be correct and effective. In this study, eight different types of power quality disturbances were synthetically generated, by using a mathematical approach. Then, continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and discrete wavelet transform with multi-resolution analysis (DWT-MRA) were applied, which eight features were then extracted from the synthesized signals. Three classifiers namely, decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) were trained to classify these disturbances. The accuracy of the classifiers was evaluated and analyzed. The best classifier was then integrated with the full model, which the performance of the proposed model was observed with 50 random signals, with and without noise. This study found that wavelet-transform was effective to localize the disturbances at the instant of their occurrence. On the other hand, the SVM classifier is superior to other classifiers with an overall accuracy of 94%. Still, the need for these classifiers to be further optimized is crucial in ensuring a more effective detection and classification system.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 139 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 45 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • State University of Malang
  • Beijing Jiaotong University
  • MILA University
  • Tafresh University
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Zaris Izzati Mohd YassinMILA University4
Haval Sardar KamilUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
Mohammad Reza MivehTafresh University4
Nor Shahida HasanUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Dygku. Asmanissa Awg. OsmanUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Muhammad Haziq Mohd WazirUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Mohd Wazir MustafaUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Hayati AbdullahUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
NN Nik Abd MalikUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Mohd Wazir MustafaUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Zulkarnain Ahmad NoordenUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Udin KomarudinUniversitas Widyatama2
Ahmad RajaniIndonesian Institute of Sciences2
Muhammad Subhan ArifinBandung Institute of Technology2
Saifulnizam Abd KhalidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Baharuddin IshakUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Aede Hatib MustaamalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti Aisyah Abd WahidUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Md Pauzi AbdullahUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Mohammad Yusri HassanUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Faridah HussinUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Abdul Hafiz RazaliUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Aede Hatib Mustaamal@JamalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ir Baharruddin IshakAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mariyati MarzukiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aji Prasetya WibawaState University of Malang1
Saodah OmarUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Arif Nur AfandiState University of Malang1
Aripriharta AriprihartaState University of Malang1
Sujito SujitoState University of Malang1
Muhammad Cahyo BagaskoroState University of Malang1
Yuni RahmawatiState University of Malang1
Gregorius Paulus Mario Laka KakiState University of Malang1
Ayu PurwatiningsihState University of Malang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, pertama di-harvest 27 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Comparison analysis of different classification methods of power quality disturbances</dc:title><dc:creator>Shafiqa Zakaria, Nur Adrinna</dc:creator><dc:creator>Said, Dalila Mat</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rosmin, Norzanah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ahmad, Nasarudin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Shah Jamil, Mohamad Shazwan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mirsaeidi, Sohrab</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;Good power quality delivery has always been in high demand in power system utilities where different types of power quality disturbances are the main obstacles. As these disturbances have distinct characteristics and even unique mitigation techniques, their detection and classification should be correct and effective. In this study, eight different types of power quality disturbances were synthetically generated, by using a mathematical approach. Then, continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and discrete wavelet transform with multi-resolution analysis (DWT-MRA) were applied, which eight features were then extracted from the synthesized signals. Three classifiers namely, decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) were trained to classify these disturbances. The accuracy of the classifiers was evaluated and analyzed. The best classifier was then integrated with the full model, which the performance of the proposed model was observed with 50 random signals, with and without noise. This study found that wavelet-transform was effective to localize the disturbances at the instant of their occurrence. On the other hand, the SVM classifier is superior to other classifiers with an overall accuracy of 94%. Still, the need for these classifiers to be further optimized is crucial in ensuring a more effective detection and classification system.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2022-12-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i6.pp5754-5764</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v12i6.pp5754-5764</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 12 No 6 (2022); 5754</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/28451/16021</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>