Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Analisis Hukum Tentang Pemanggilan Anggota Dpr Yang Diduga Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pasca Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 76/Puu-Xii/2014

Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022) · hlm. 107–122

DOI
10.22437/limbago.v2i1.17635
ISSN
2797-9040
Terbit
2022-02-28
Penerbit
Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

It is deemed necessary to examine the mechanism for taking action against DPR members who commit acts of corruption based on several considerations, namely first, that the DPR RI is currently in the highest position in the list of corruption cases. Second, efforts to eradicate corruption are a shared commitment that must be a priority. Based on this, the writer draws two formulations of the problem, namely How is the process of summoning members of the DPR by law enforcement officials after the issuance of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 76/PUU-XII/2014? And what are the legal implications of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 76/PUU-XII/2014 on the process of summoning members of the DPR who are suspected of committing criminal acts? Furthermore, the author uses a normative juridical research method, so that two main points are obtained, namely, first, Article 245 before being submitted to the Constitutional Court, when law enforcement officials will conduct an examination of members of the DPR must obtain written permission, which means that the investigators will experience difficulties. stating that the examination must have a presidential permit does not answer the substance of the case application, because article 245 before being submitted to the Constitutional Court contains an examination permit from the MKD. Meanwhile, the decision of the case contains permission from the president. Keywords: Legal Analysis, DPR, Corruption

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

19 penulis · 26 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Jambi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad Alfin Ardian AlfinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Alfin Ardian AlfinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fira NatashaUniversitas Jambi1
Bustanuddin BustanuddinUniversitas Jambi1
Alcika FerdinUniversitas Jambi1
Rachmad YantoUniversitas Jambi1
Enrico Gustian IsvardoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad AminUniversitas Jambi1
Refsinas RefsinasUniversitas Jambi1
Riyan RipaldiUniversitas Jambi1
AnsorullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mukhaimin SukriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Meri YarniUniversitas Jambi1
Siska HasraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Daffa FadhillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
BustanuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Daffa FadhillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Limbago/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Analisis Hukum Tentang Pemanggilan Anggota Dpr Yang Diduga Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pasca Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 76/Puu-Xii/2014</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wahyu saputra, Wahyu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Priskap, Ridham </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Analisis Hukum;</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat;</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Korupsi;</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">It is deemed necessary to examine the mechanism for taking action against DPR members who commit acts of corruption based on several considerations, namely first, that the DPR RI is currently in the highest position in the list of corruption cases. Second, efforts to eradicate corruption are a shared commitment that must be a priority. Based on this, the writer draws two formulations of the problem, namely How is the process of summoning members of the DPR by law enforcement officials after the issuance of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 76/PUU-XII/2014? And what are the legal implications of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 76/PUU-XII/2014 on the process of summoning members of the DPR who are suspected of committing criminal acts? Furthermore, the author uses a normative juridical research method, so that two main points are obtained, namely, first, Article 245 before being submitted to the Constitutional Court, when law enforcement officials will conduct an examination of members of the DPR must obtain written permission, which means that the investigators will experience difficulties. stating that the examination must have a presidential permit does not answer the substance of the case application, because article 245 before being submitted to the Constitutional Court contains an examination permit from the MKD. Meanwhile, the decision of the case contains permission from the president.
&amp;nbsp;
Keywords: Legal Analysis, DPR, Corruption</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-02-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Limbago/article/view/17635</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/limbago.v2i1.17635</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022); 107-122</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2797-9040</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/limbago.v2i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Limbago/article/view/17635/13606</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Wahyu Wahyu saputra, Ridham Priskap</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>