Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Navigating the use of AI in academic writing: Challenges and strategies for EFL students

Proceedings Academic Universitas Jambi · Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025) · hlm. 1271–1281

DOI
10.22437/proca.v1i3.50591
Terbit
2025-12-15
Penerbit
LPPM Universitas Jambi
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to explore the perceptions, challenges, and strategies of using ChatGPT by EFL students in academic writing. The study involved 81 fifth semester students in one public university in Jambi. This study is part of a mixed-methods research planned by the researchers. This research contributes to the understanding of the integration of AI in writing and the importance of developing digital literacy and ethical awareness among students. Data were gathered by using a close-ended questionnaire and analyzed descriptively. The findings show that students perceive ChatGPT as highly effective in supporting key aspects of academic writing, particularly in brainstorming, organizing ideas, summarizing, paraphrasing, and improving writing style. When interpreted through Self-Regulated Learning theory, the results indicate that ChatGPT acts as a scaffold that strengthens learners’ planning, monitoring, and self-reflection processes. However, students also express concerns related to ethical risks such as plagiarism, misinformation, reduced creativity, and weakened critical thinking. Overall, the findings highlight the need for responsible use, clear institutional guidelines, and targeted training to ensure that ChatGPT enhances rather than replaces essential academic skills.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 135 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Melati MelatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Reny HeryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Nyimas Triyana SafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mukhlash AbrarAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Susanah SusanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rachmawati RachmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fortunasari FortunasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mukhlas AbrarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Masbirorotni MasbirorotniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
MasbirorotniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
FailasofahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nely ArifAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bunga Ayu WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dony EfrizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Erisa KurniatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendri HendriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ernanda ErnandaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad RidhaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Adrefiza AdrefizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indri AnastasiaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Habizar HabizarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muchlash AbrarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hustarna HustarnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Duti VolyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nyimas Triyana SafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Harizah ZafirahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nuria Anastasya BilbinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
MelatiNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Lilik UlfiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SusanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dedy KurniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tubagus Zam Zam Al ArifAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
ArmiawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/PROCA/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Navigating the use of AI in academic writing: Challenges and strategies for EFL students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fajaryani, Nunung</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Thabran, Yulhenli</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mardiah, Radiatan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ali, Rd. M.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Volya, Duty</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Almuqsith, Fatan Tsarif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ramadhani, Annisa Rizkika</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Academic Writing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">AI Writing Assistant</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">ChatGPT</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Mixed-Methods Design</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aims to explore the perceptions, challenges, and strategies of using ChatGPT by EFL students in academic writing. The study involved 81 fifth semester students in one public university in Jambi. This study is part of a mixed-methods research planned by the researchers. This research contributes to the understanding of the integration of AI in writing and the importance of developing digital literacy and ethical awareness among students. Data were gathered by using a close-ended questionnaire and analyzed descriptively. The findings show that students perceive ChatGPT as highly effective in supporting key aspects of academic writing, particularly in brainstorming, organizing ideas, summarizing, paraphrasing, and improving writing style. When interpreted through Self-Regulated Learning theory, the results indicate that ChatGPT acts as a scaffold that strengthens learners’ planning, monitoring, and self-reflection processes. However, students also express concerns related to ethical risks such as plagiarism, misinformation, reduced creativity, and weakened critical thinking. Overall, the findings highlight the need for responsible use, clear institutional guidelines, and targeted training to ensure that ChatGPT enhances rather than replaces essential academic skills.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">LPPM Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/PROCA/article/view/50591</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/proca.v1i3.50591</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Proceedings Academic Universitas Jambi; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): English Education International Conference (EDUTICON); 1271-1281</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/proca.v1i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/PROCA/article/view/50591/22852</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Nunung Fajaryani, Yulhenli Thabran, Radiatan Mardiah, Rd. M. Ali, Duty Volya, Fatan Tsarif Almuqsith, Annisa Rizkika Ramadhani</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>