Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Perjanjian Investasi Bilateral: Self-Judging Sebagai Solusi?

Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law · Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022) · hlm. 245–277

DOI
10.22437/up.v3i3.19436
ISSN
2721-8333, 2721-8031
Terbit
2022-10-11
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi
Bahasa
id
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Inggris

This article was prepared to formulate a strategy for formulating the drafting of exclusion clauses in bilateral investment treaties and legal policies that are in accordance with national security without violating international law. In its preparation, doctrinal legal research with legal objects is used which is conceptualized as a statutory rule based on the doctrine of positivism (normative juridical) schools. In the Discussion, it was found that Host Country has several options in implementing policies that put forward the national interest such as, asserting rights in agreements in good faith, including exceptions expressly, establishing definitions appropriately in agreements, mentioning special clause categories in agreements, conducting evaluations in a reasonable manner and self-judging. However, of the seven options already mentioned, self-judging is the most profitable option for host countries in implementing policies that orientate national interests. The self-judging clause is the choice of host country for two reasons. First, the clause gives the state discretion to unilaterally opt-out of international obligations and secondly, the evaluation of the elements for opt-out is not set out completely objectively from an external point of view, but only from the point of view of the state concerned.

Bahasa Indonesia

This article was prepared to formulate a strategy for formulating the drafting of exclusion clauses in bilateral investment treaties and legal policies that are in accordance with national security without violating international law. In its preparation, doctrinal legal research with legal objects is used which is conceptualized as a statutory rule based on the doctrine of positivism (normative juridical) schools. In the Discussion, it was found that Host Country has several options in implementing policies that put forward the national interest such as, asserting rights in agreements in good faith, including exceptions expressly, establishing definitions appropriately in agreements, mentioning special clause categories in agreements, conducting evaluations in a reasonable manner and self-judging. However, of the seven options already mentioned, self-judging is the most profitable option for host countries in implementing policies that orientate national interests. The self-judging clause is the choice of host country for two reasons. First, the clause gives the state discretion to unilaterally opt-out of international obligations and secondly, the evaluation of the elements for opt-out is not set out completely objectively from an external point of view, but only from the point of view of the state concerned.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

24 penulis · 38 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Indonesia
  • Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • Universitas Jambi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Hadi Rahmat PurnamaUniversity of Indonesia2
M. Ikhsan LapadenganAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
M. Ikhsan LapadenganUniversity of Indonesia2
Anbar JayadiUniversity of Indonesia1
Angela VaniaUniversity of Indonesia1
Salsabila Siliwangi SurtiwaUniversity of Indonesia1
Topo SantosoUniversity of Indonesia1
Febby Mutiara NelsonUniversity of Indonesia1
Mohd Hazmi Mohd RusliUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia1
Bintang Wicaksono AjieUniversity of Indonesia1
Mutiara WindraskinasihUniversity of Indonesia1
Rizky Banyualam PermanaUniversity of Indonesia1
Rizka IswaraUniversity of Indonesia1
Gledys Deyana WahyudinUniversity of Indonesia1
Igor YosoUniversity of Indonesia1
Ananda Kurniawan SukarmajiUniversity of Indonesia1
Akbar Kurnia PutraUniversitas Jambi1
Yetty Komalasari DewiUniversity of Indonesia1
Elisabeth ArdiastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Erni Eriza SiburianAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Utipossidetis/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Perjanjian Investasi Bilateral: Self-Judging Sebagai Solusi?</dc:title>
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Perjanjian Investasi Bilateral: Self-Judging Sebagai Solusi?</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fakhriah, Sakina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Afriansyah, Arie</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Fakhriah, Sakina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Afriansyah, Arie</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">national security</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">bilateral investment treaty</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">security exception</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">keamanan nasional</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">pernjanjian investasi bilateral</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">pengecualian keamanan</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article was prepared to formulate a strategy for formulating the drafting of exclusion clauses in bilateral investment treaties and legal policies that are in accordance with national security without violating international law. In its preparation, doctrinal legal research with legal objects is used which is conceptualized as a statutory rule based on the doctrine of positivism (normative juridical) schools. In the Discussion, it was found that Host Country has several options in implementing policies that put forward the national interest such as, asserting rights in agreements in good faith, including exceptions expressly, establishing definitions appropriately in agreements, mentioning special clause categories in agreements, conducting evaluations in a reasonable manner and self-judging. However, of the seven options already mentioned, self-judging is the most profitable option for host countries in implementing policies that orientate national interests. The self-judging clause is the choice of host country for two reasons. First, the clause gives the state discretion to unilaterally opt-out of international obligations and secondly, the evaluation of the elements for opt-out is not set out completely objectively from an external point of view, but only from the point of view of the state concerned.</dc:description>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">This article was prepared to formulate a strategy for formulating the drafting of exclusion clauses in bilateral investment treaties and legal policies that are in accordance with national security without violating international law. In its preparation, doctrinal legal research with legal objects is used which is conceptualized as a statutory rule based on the doctrine of positivism (normative juridical) schools. In the Discussion, it was found that Host Country has several options in implementing policies that put forward the national interest such as, asserting rights in agreements in good faith, including exceptions expressly, establishing definitions appropriately in agreements, mentioning special clause categories in agreements, conducting evaluations in a reasonable manner and self-judging. However, of the seven options already mentioned, self-judging is the most profitable option for host countries in implementing policies that orientate national interests. The self-judging clause is the choice of host country for two reasons. First, the clause gives the state discretion to unilaterally opt-out of international obligations and secondly, the evaluation of the elements for opt-out is not set out completely objectively from an external point of view, but only from the point of view of the state concerned.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-10-11</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Utipossidetis/article/view/19436</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/up.v3i3.19436</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022); 245-277</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law; Vol 3 No 3 (2022); 245-277</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8333</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8031</dc:source>
	<dc:language>id</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Utipossidetis/article/view/19436/14257</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Sakina Fakhriah, Arie Afriansyah</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>