Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Dualisme Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama dalam Pengangkatan Anak Beragama Islam

Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 171–187

DOI
10.22437/nt78af64
ISSN
2721-5318, 2721-8759
Terbit
2025-09-17
Penerbit
Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze judicial authority in cases of child adoption for Muslims, particularly the conflict between the jurisdiction of the District Court and the Religious Court. Child adoption plays an important role in ensuring the protection and welfare of children, yet in practice it often creates dualism of authority that leads to legal uncertainty. This research applies a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The findings reveal that District Courts continue to accept and adjudicate adoption cases involving Muslim children based on the Child Protection Law and Supreme Court Circular Letters. However, this practice contradicts Law Number 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts, which explicitly grants absolute authority over adoption cases for Muslims to the Religious Court. This situation results in a normative conflict between general civil law and Islamic family law jurisdiction. Therefore, harmonization of regulations, clearer delineation of judicial authority, and increased judicial awareness are needed to avoid overlapping decisions. The study concludes that legal certainty and optimal child protection can only be achieved if the absolute jurisdiction of the Religious Court is upheld, in line with the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 85 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Cenderawasih University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi SuryahartatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sasmiar SasmiarAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
M HosenAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Windarto WindartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indriya FathniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Supeno SupenoCenderawasih University1
Syed Mohd Uzair IqbalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dony Yusra PebriantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Elizabaeth SiregarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yulia MonitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Erwin ErwinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arsyad ArsyadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isran IdrisAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Elizabeth SiregarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dony Yusra PebriantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indriyah FatniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Valiant Asri NugrahaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Diana AmirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Helmi HelmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Retno KusniatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hafrida HafridaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bustanuddin BustanuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indra LestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Astra VigoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yosephine Mory Kezia SimbolonAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ariyanto AriyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Raffles RafflesAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eza AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indri WinarsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alya Rihadatul Aisy SetyonegoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agya KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Taufik YahyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Affa SjamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ari Annisa FitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitria YusevaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rifda Marsall AqilaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Emi Nickyta SidabutarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Zaaken/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Dualisme Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama dalam Pengangkatan Anak Beragama Islam</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Dian Prameswari, Ineke</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rosmidah, Rosmidah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Oktaviarni, Firya</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Child adoption</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">judicial authority</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Islamic law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aims to analyze judicial authority in cases of child adoption for Muslims, particularly the conflict between the jurisdiction of the District Court and the Religious Court. Child adoption plays an important role in ensuring the protection and welfare of children, yet in practice it often creates dualism of authority that leads to legal uncertainty. This research applies a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The findings reveal that District Courts continue to accept and adjudicate adoption cases involving Muslim children based on the Child Protection Law and Supreme Court Circular Letters. However, this practice contradicts Law Number 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts, which explicitly grants absolute authority over adoption cases for Muslims to the Religious Court. This situation results in a normative conflict between general civil law and Islamic family law jurisdiction. Therefore, harmonization of regulations, clearer delineation of judicial authority, and increased judicial awareness are needed to avoid overlapping decisions. The study concludes that legal certainty and optimal child protection can only be achieved if the absolute jurisdiction of the Religious Court is upheld, in line with the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-09-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Zaaken/article/view/43047</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/nt78af64</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025; 171-187</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-5318</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8759</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/zaaken.v6i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Zaaken/article/view/43047/22119</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Ineke Dian Prameswari, Rosmidah, Firya Oktaviarni</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>