Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Performance numerical evaluation of modified single-ended primary-inductor converter for photovoltaic systems

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 13 No. 4 (2023)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp3720-3732
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2023-08-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) was considered a good alternative to a DC-DC converter for photovoltaic (PV) systems. The SEPIC converter can operate with an input voltage greater or less than the regulated output voltage, or as a step-up or step-down. As a step-up converter, SEPIC boosts PV voltage to specific levels. However, gain limitation and voltage stress continue to reduce the efficiency of conventional SEPIC converters. Because of this, researchers created a modified SEPIC converter to improve performance. In this paper, six modified SEPIC converters were compared and evaluated. To compare fairly, all modified SEPIC converters are non-isolated and use a single switch. Power simulator (PSIM) software was used to simulate each converter with a BISOL BMO-250 PV module and maximum power point tracking (MPPT) P&O controller. The converter with the highest static voltage gain and lowest duty cycle has been identified. It results in up to ten times voltage increment with a 0.8-duty ratio. All topologies have the same voltage stress, with maximum and minimum values of 30.1 and 29.5 V, respectively. On the other hand, each topology produces different average efficiencies, with the highest and lowest efficiency at 99.5% and 97.2%, respectively.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 93 co-authorship links · 46 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • Lampung University
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Mohammad JannatiUniversity of Technology Malaysia16
Mohd Junaidi Abdul AzizUniversity of Technology Malaysia14
Mohd Hatta JopriUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka8
Mustafa ManapUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka7
Awang JusohUniversity of Technology Malaysia7
Abdul Rahim AbdullahUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka6
M. Rahimi YusoffUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka4
Muhammad AdoUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
M. GhanbariAffiliation unknown4
Lina HandayaniUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan3
Imam Much Ibnu SubrotoSultan Agung Islamic University3
Shahreen binti KasimTun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia3
Mahmoud ZadehbagheriIslamic Azad University, Tehran3
Mohammad Javad KianiIslamic Azad University, Tehran3
Vahdat NazerianUniversity of Mazandaran3
Auzani JidinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka3
Munawar Agus RiyadiDiponegoro University2
Deris StiawanSriwijaya University2
M. Najafi KhoshrodiAffiliation unknown2
A.S. HussinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Mohd Ruddin Ab GhaniUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Mehdi DadkhahIslamic Azad University, Tehran2
Shahaboddin ShamshirbandUniversity of Malaya2
Ali AjamiAffiliation unknown2
Chibuike Peter OhanuUniversity of Nigeria2
Aiman Zakwan JidinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Rozana AlikUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
M.F. HabbanUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Muhammad Firdaus Abd RazakUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Mohamad Hamka Bin SaifulUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Sri PurwiyantiLampung University1
Herri GusmediLampung University1
Endah KomalasariLampung University1
Abdul Rashid HusainUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Sahazati Md RozaliUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Muhammad Nizam KamarudinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Performance numerical evaluation of modified single-ended primary-inductor converter for photovoltaic systems</dc:title><dc:creator>Sutikno, Tole</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aprilianto, Rizky Ajie</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nik Idris, Nik Rumzi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Samosir, Ahmad Saudi</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;Single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) was considered a good alternative to a DC-DC converter for photovoltaic (PV) systems. The SEPIC converter can operate with an input voltage greater or less than the regulated output voltage, or as a step-up or step-down. As a step-up converter, SEPIC boosts PV voltage to specific levels. However, gain limitation and voltage stress continue to reduce the efficiency of conventional SEPIC converters. Because of this, researchers created a modified SEPIC converter to improve performance. In this paper, six modified SEPIC converters were compared and evaluated. To compare fairly, all modified SEPIC converters are non-isolated and use a single switch. Power simulator (PSIM) software was used to simulate each converter with a BISOL BMO-250 PV module and maximum power point tracking (MPPT) P&amp;amp;amp;O controller. The converter with the highest static voltage gain and lowest duty cycle has been identified. It results in up to ten times voltage increment with a 0.8-duty ratio. All topologies have the same voltage stress, with maximum and minimum values of 30.1 and 29.5 V, respectively. On the other hand, each topology produces different average efficiencies, with the highest and lowest efficiency at 99.5% and 97.2%, respectively.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-08-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp3720-3732</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp3720-3732</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 13 No 4 (2023); 3720</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/30948/16757</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>