Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Wearable sensor-based human activity recognition with ensemble learning: a comparison study

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 13 No. 4 (2023)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp4029-4040
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2023-08-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The spectacular growth of wearable sensors has provided a key contribution to the field of human activity recognition. Due to its effective and versatile usage and application in various fields such as smart homes and medical areas, human activity recognition has always been an appealing research topic in artificial intelligence. From this perspective, there are a lot of existing works that make use of accelerometer and gyroscope sensor data for recognizing human activities. This paper presents a comparative study of ensemble learning methods for human activity recognition. The methods include random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Among the ensemble learning methods in comparison, light gradient boosting machine and random forest demonstrate the best performance. The experimental results revealed that light gradient boosting machine yields the highest accuracy of 94.50% on UCI-HAR dataset and 100% on single accelerometer dataset while random forest records the highest accuracy of 93.41% on motion sense dataset.

Collaboration network of the authors

11 authors · 27 co-authorship links · 9 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Multimedia University
  • University of Science and Technology
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Heng Siong LimMultimedia University3
Ebenezer Akinyemi AjayiMultimedia University2
Siew-Chin ChongMultimedia University2
Kah Liang OngMultimedia University2
Mohammed AbdullahUniversity of Science and Technology1
Gehad Ali Abdulrahman QasemUniversity of Science and Technology1
Mazen FaridMultimedia University1
Nasr AlsakkafUniversity of Science and Technology1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Wearable sensor-based human activity recognition with ensemble learning: a comparison study</dc:title><dc:creator>Luwe, Yee Jia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lee, Chin Poo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lim, Kian Ming</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The spectacular growth of wearable sensors has provided a key contribution to the field of human activity recognition. Due to its effective and versatile usage and application in various fields such as smart homes and medical areas, human activity recognition has always been an appealing research topic in artificial intelligence. From this perspective, there are a lot of existing works that make use of accelerometer and gyroscope sensor data for recognizing human activities. This paper presents a comparative study of ensemble learning methods for human activity recognition. The methods include random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Among the ensemble learning methods in comparison, light gradient boosting machine and random forest demonstrate the best performance. The experimental results revealed that light gradient boosting machine yields the highest accuracy of 94.50% on UCI-HAR dataset and 100% on single accelerometer dataset while random forest records the highest accuracy of 93.41% on motion sense dataset.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-08-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp4029-4040</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp4029-4040</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 13 No 4 (2023); 4029</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/29016/16685</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>