Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Evaluating an EFL Textbook: A Good Fit, Adequate Fit, a Poor Fit or Totally Wrong?

Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE| · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023)

DOI
10.22437/irje.v7i2.27610
ISSN
2580-5711
Terbit
2023-12-31
Penerbit
Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This research aimed to investigate an evaluation of an EFL textbook for senior high school students entitled “Functional English for Senior High Schools” written by Sugeng and Zaimah (2007). The book was published in 2007 by Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri, Solo. The researchers used a qualitative evaluation checklist, namely “Evaluation of the Fit” by Byrd et al. (2001) by evaluating the fitness of textbooks through three aspects: curriculum, students, and teachers. The evaluation results are: (1) considering the curriculum aspect, the book was categorized as a good fit, (2) considering the fitness of the book with the students’ needs. It was categorized as a good and adequate fit. However, (3) considering the teachers’ aspect, the book was considered a poor fit because it was not completed with supplementary teaching materials, such as cassettes or CDs and manual supports for teachers. The conclusion showed the textbook was categorized as an adequate fit for the curriculum, students, and teachers, and it needed manual and technological support for a more beneficial function.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

5 penulis · 6 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Padjadjaran University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Siti Fatimah AzzahraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Anita AnitaPadjadjaran University1
Neisya NeisyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/irje/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Evaluating an EFL Textbook: A Good Fit, Adequate Fit, a Poor Fit or Totally Wrong?</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Aprilia, Fitria</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Neisya</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This research aimed to investigate an evaluation of an EFL textbook for senior high school students entitled “Functional English for Senior High Schools” written by Sugeng and Zaimah (2007). The book was published in 2007 by Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri, Solo. The researchers used a qualitative evaluation checklist, namely “Evaluation of the Fit” by Byrd et al. (2001) by evaluating the fitness of textbooks through three aspects: curriculum, students, and teachers. The evaluation results are: (1) considering the curriculum aspect, the book was categorized as a good fit, (2) considering the fitness of the book with the students’ needs. It was categorized as a good and adequate fit. However, (3) considering the teachers’ aspect, the book was considered a poor fit because it was not completed with supplementary teaching materials, such as cassettes or CDs and manual supports for teachers. The conclusion showed the textbook was categorized as an adequate fit for the curriculum, students, and teachers, and it needed manual and technological support for a more beneficial function.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Jambi, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/irje/article/view/27610</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/irje.v7i2.27610</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023):  IRJE |Indonesian Research Journal in Education; 487 –499</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-5711</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/irje/article/view/27610/17455</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>