Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

A Comparison Between The 5:2 And 16:8 Intermittent Fasting Methods on Weight Loss in Overweight And Obese Individuals

Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan · Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 91–97

DOI
10.22437/jmj.v13i1.43577
ISSN
2580-6874, 2339-269X
Terbit
2025-05-24
Penerbit
FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU KESEHATAN UNIVERSITAS JAMBI
Bahasa
en

Abstrak

ABSTRACT Background: Overweight and obesity are conditions characterized by excess body weight, which increase the risk of chronic diseases. One of the main contributing factors is dietary habits. A popular intervention for weight loss is the Intermittent Fasting (IF) diet, particularly the 5:2 and 16:8 methods. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the 5:2 and 16:8 IF methods in reducing body weight among overweight and obese individuals. Methods: This research employed a pre and post test design involving 50 respondents, divided into two groups, and subjected to a 6-week intervention. Data were analyzed using the Paired Sample T-Test (for IF 5:2), the Wilcoxon Test (for IF 16:8), and the Mann-Whitney Test for comparison between the two groups. Results: The results showed that the IF 5:2 group experienced an average weight loss of 3.38% (p < 0.001), while the IF 16:8 group had a weight loss of 2.28% (p = 0.000). The comparison between the two groups yielded a p-value of 0.081. Conclusion: Both IF methods, 5:2 and 16:8, are effective in significantly reducing body weight. Although the 5:2 method resulted in a greater weight loss, the difference between the two methods was not statistically significant.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 165 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 2 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Jambi
  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Susan TarawifaUniversitas Jambi10
Nyimas Natasha Ayu ShafiraUniversitas Jambi10
Anggelia PuspasariUniversitas Jambi10
Erny KusdiyahUniversitas Jambi7
Huntari HarahapUniversitas Jambi6
Tia Wida EkaputriUniversitas Jambi5
Bambang HariyadiUniversitas Jambi4
Asrial AsrialUniversitas Jambi4
Muhammad Salsabeela RusdiUniversitas Jambi4
Citra MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Citra MaharaniUniversitas Jambi4
Wahyu Indah Dewi AuroraUniversitas Jambi4
Herlambang HerlambangUniversitas Jambi3
Amelia Dwi FitriUniversitas Jambi3
Herlambang HerlambangUniversitas Jambi3
Rita HalimUniversitas Jambi2
Tia Wida Ekaputri HzUniversitas Jambi2
Kamid KamidUniversitas Jambi2
Fairuz FairuzUniversitas Jambi1
Hasna DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nuriyah NuriyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lipinwati LipinwatiUniversitas Jambi1
Nur Afni LestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri Astuti SiregarUniversitas Jambi1
Puspita SariUniversitas Jambi1
Hanina HaninaUniversitas Jambi1
amadea rizkiyani noorAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
NuriyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mhd Habib Dwi MahendraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
HaninaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zahra Frizki AstyUniversitas Jambi1
Sudarmin SudarminState University of Semarang1
Affan MalikUniversitas Jambi1
Zurweni ZurweniUniversitas Jambi1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/kedokteran/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">A Comparison Between The 5:2 And 16:8 Intermittent Fasting Methods on Weight Loss in Overweight And Obese Individuals</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ayudia, Esa Indah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Calista, Amanda Athiyyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Enis, Rina Nofri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Perkasa, Tengku Arief Buana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anggraini, Bayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Asyhar, Rayandra</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">overweight</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">obesity</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">intermitten fasting</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">weight loss</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">ABSTRACT
Background: Overweight and obesity are conditions characterized by excess body weight, which increase the risk of chronic diseases. One of the main contributing factors is dietary habits. A popular intervention for weight loss is the Intermittent Fasting (IF) diet, particularly the 5:2 and 16:8 methods. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the 5:2 and 16:8 IF methods in reducing body weight among overweight and obese individuals.
Methods: This research employed a pre and post test design involving 50 respondents, divided into two groups, and subjected to a 6-week intervention. Data were analyzed using the Paired Sample T-Test (for IF 5:2), the Wilcoxon Test (for IF 16:8), and the Mann-Whitney Test for comparison between the two groups.
Results: The results showed that the IF 5:2 group experienced an average weight loss of 3.38% (p &amp;lt; 0.001), while the IF 16:8 group had a weight loss of 2.28% (p = 0.000). The comparison between the two groups yielded a p-value of 0.081.
Conclusion: Both IF methods, 5:2 and 16:8, are effective in significantly reducing body weight. Although the 5:2 method resulted in a greater weight loss, the difference between the two methods was not statistically significant.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU KESEHATAN UNIVERSITAS JAMBI</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-05-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/kedokteran/article/view/43577</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/jmj.v13i1.43577</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): JAMBI MEDICAL JOURNAL: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan; 91-97</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-6874</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-269X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/kedokteran/article/view/43577/20990</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>