Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Assessment Instruments for Interprofessional Education and Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: A Narrative Review and Analysis of the Need for New Assessment Instruments

Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan · Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 152–161

DOI
10.22437/9n8sat65
ISSN
2580-6874, 2339-269X
Terbit
2026-10-29
Penerbit
FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU KESEHATAN UNIVERSITAS JAMBI
Bahasa
en

Abstrak

Background: Assessment instruments in interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) address diverse constructs. This review examined their characteristics and relevance to faculty readiness for IPE facilitation. Method: This narrative review used focused, non-systematic search of Pubmed and the Journal of Interprofessional Care. Relevant instrument studies and faculty literature were purposively selected, with instrument characteristics and measurement evidence synthesized narratively. Result: Fourteen instrument families addressed attitudes, perceptions, and professional socialization; self-reported collaborative competence; and collaboration in clinical settings. Measurement evidence varied across versions and populations. Instrument comparisons and faculty development literature infromed five candidate domains: understanding IPE; motivation and commitment; pedagogical facilitation; collaborative role modelling; and confidence and perceived preparedness. Conclusion: The proposed domains provide a conceptual basis for assessing faculty readiness and require validation. Existing facilitator-focused measures should be examined for content coverage and potential adaptation before developing a new instrument

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 151 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Jambi
  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rina Nofri EnisUniversitas Jambi20
Susan TarawifaUniversitas Jambi18
Herlambang HerlambangUniversitas Jambi8
Erny KusdiyahUniversitas Jambi8
Citra MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Citra MaharaniUniversitas Jambi6
Huntari HarahapUniversitas Jambi5
Rita HalimUniversitas Jambi4
Tia Wida Ekaputri HzUniversitas Jambi4
Wahyu Indah Dewi AuroraUniversitas Jambi3
Siti RaudhohUniversitas Jambi3
Nindya AryantyUniversitas Jambi3
Tia Wida EkaputriUniversitas Jambi3
Elfiani ElfianiUniversitas Jambi3
Tengku Arief Buana PerkasaUniversitas Jambi2
Charles Apul SimanjuntakUniversitas Jambi2
Nys. Natasha Ayu SUniversitas Jambi2
Anati PurwakanthiUniversitas Jambi2
Mulawarman MulawarmanState University of Semarang1
Upik YeliantiUniversitas Jambi1
Zulfanety ZulfanetyUniversitas Jambi1
Asro Hayani HarahapAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jelica OctavianiUniversitas Jambi1
Esa Indah Ayudia TanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Raihanah SuzanUniversitas Jambi1
Giva DianisaUniversitas Jambi1
Intan OktariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tira Nalvianti RahmiUniversitas Jambi1
Jelpa PeriantaloUniversitas Jambi1
Attiya IstariniUniversitas Jambi1
EmiyatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
AparamintaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anggia Rohdila SariUniversitas Jambi1
Agnesia Feronika PanggabeanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
ahmad sauqiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/kedokteran/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Assessment Instruments for Interprofessional Education and Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: A Narrative Review and Analysis of the Need for New Assessment Instruments</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Simbolon, Avrilianti Skolastika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fitri, Amelia Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Puspasari, Anggelia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Shafira, Nyimas Natasha Ayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Herlambang, Herlambang</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Review</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Interprofessional education</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Assessment instruments</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Faculty development</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Background: Assessment instruments in interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) address diverse constructs. This review examined their characteristics and relevance to faculty readiness for IPE facilitation.
Method: This narrative review used focused, non-systematic search of Pubmed and the Journal of Interprofessional Care. Relevant instrument studies and faculty literature were purposively selected, with instrument characteristics and measurement evidence synthesized narratively.
Result: Fourteen instrument families addressed attitudes, perceptions, and professional socialization; self-reported collaborative competence; and collaboration in clinical settings. Measurement evidence varied across versions and populations. Instrument comparisons and faculty development literature infromed five candidate domains: understanding IPE; motivation and commitment; pedagogical facilitation; collaborative role modelling; and confidence and perceived preparedness.
Conclusion: The proposed domains provide a conceptual basis for  assessing faculty readiness and require validation. Existing facilitator-focused measures should be examined for content coverage and potential adaptation before developing a new instrument</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU KESEHATAN UNIVERSITAS JAMBI</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/kedokteran/article/view/60837</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/9n8sat65</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026):  JAMBI MEDICAL JOURNAL: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan; 152-161</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-6874</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-269X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/kedokteran/article/view/60837/25942</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>