Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Pedagogical Practices for Fostering Agentic Engagement in Experiential Learning: A Systematic Literature Review

Tekno - Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan · Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 245–257

DOI
10.22437/a6ew2r80
ISSN
2715-7415, 2088-205X
Terbit
2026-02-27
Penerbit
Program Magister Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Jambi
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The increasing emphasis on student-centered learning has highlighted the importance of understanding how pedagogical practices foster learners’ ability to actively influence and participate in their learning processes. This study aims to systematically identify and synthesize pedagogical practices that support agentic engagement in experiential learning environments. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Literature searches were performed using the Scopus database, resulting in 622 identified records, of which 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed through thematic narrative synthesis. The findings indicate that agentic engagement develops through interconnected pedagogical mechanisms, including autonomy-supportive practices, student voice and co-creation, dialogic feedback, inquiry-based learning, and collaborative problem-solving. The review also demonstrates that experiential and nonformal learning environments provide authentic opportunities for students to exercise agency through decision-making, leadership, reflection, and active participation. This study contributes to the literature by integrating fragmented evidence on pedagogical conditions that enable learner agency and by highlighting the importance of designing learning environments that position students as active contributors and co-constructors of knowledge. Future research should further examine how facilitator competencies and contextual factors influence agentic engagement across diverse experiential learning settings.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

14 penulis · 26 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 14 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • LSPR Institute of Communication and Business
  • State University of Semarang
  • Lambung Mangkurat University
  • Islamic University of Riau
  • Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjary
  • Universiti of Malaysia Sabah
  • Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yolanda StellarosaLSPR Institute of Communication and Business1
Chrisdina ChrisdinaLSPR Institute of Communication and Business1
Greta Ariati MulyosantosoLSPR Institute of Communication and Business1
Kimberly Gavrila HaranataLSPR Institute of Communication and Business1
Diah Rizki Nur KalifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ipang SetiawanState University of Semarang1
MahmudahUniversitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjary1
Eko SuhartonoLambung Mangkurat University1
Ahmad HidayatIslamic University of Riau1
Patricia SatorUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah1
Abdul HananInstitut Pesantren Babakan1
Esti WidianiPoltekkes Kemenkes Malang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/pedagogi/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Pedagogical Practices for Fostering Agentic Engagement in Experiential Learning: A Systematic Literature Review</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hidayah, Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Utari, Rahmania</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Agentic Engagement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Learner Agency</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pedagogical Practices</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Student Voice</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The increasing emphasis on student-centered learning has highlighted the importance of understanding how pedagogical practices foster learners’ ability to actively influence and participate in their learning processes. This study aims to systematically identify and synthesize pedagogical practices that support agentic engagement in experiential learning environments. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Literature searches were performed using the Scopus database, resulting in 622 identified records, of which 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed through thematic narrative synthesis. The findings indicate that agentic engagement develops through interconnected pedagogical mechanisms, including autonomy-supportive practices, student voice and co-creation, dialogic feedback, inquiry-based learning, and collaborative problem-solving. The review also demonstrates that experiential and nonformal learning environments provide authentic opportunities for students to exercise agency through decision-making, leadership, reflection, and active participation. This study contributes to the literature by integrating fragmented evidence on pedagogical conditions that enable learner agency and by highlighting the importance of designing learning environments that position students as active contributors and co-constructors of knowledge. Future research should further examine how facilitator competencies and contextual factors influence agentic engagement across diverse experiential learning settings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Program Magister Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-02-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pedagogi/article/view/55707</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/a6ew2r80</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Tekno - Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Tekno-Pedagogi; 245-257</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-7415</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-205X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pedagogi/article/view/55707/25470</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Nurul Hidayah, Rahmania Utari</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>