Alzheimer’s disease (AD) stands as a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with a significant global public health impact. It is imperative to establish early and accurate diagnoses of AD to facilitate effective interventions and treatments. Recent years have witnessed the emergence of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques, displaying promise in various medical domains, including AD diagnosis. This study undertakes a comprehensive contrast between conventional machine learning methods and advanced deep learning strategies for early AD diagnosis. Conventional ML algorithms like support vector machines, decision trees, and K nearest neighbor have been extensively employed for AD diagnosis through relevant feature extraction from heterogeneous data sources. Conversely, deep learning techniques such as multilayer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated exceptional aptitude in autonomously uncovering intricate patterns and representations from unprocessed data like EEG data. The findings reveal that while traditional ML methods may perform adequately with limited data, deep learning techniques excel when ample data is available, showcasing their potential for early and precise AD diagnosis. In conclusion, this research paper contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding the choice of appropriate methodologies for early Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis.
Collaboration network of the authors
13 authors ·
26 co-authorship links
· 15 across different organisations
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
AISSMS Institute of Information Technology
Kennesaw State University
Prince of Songkla University
Symbiosis International University
Sahyadri College of Engineering & Management
New Horizon College of Engineering
MIT Academy of Engineering
Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.