Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Data mining for predictive analysis in gynecology: a focus on cervical health

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 14 No. 3 (2024)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v14i3.pp2822-2833
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2024-06-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Currently, data mining based on the application of detection of important patterns that allow making decisions according to cervical cancer is a problem that affects women from the age of 24 years and older. For this purpose, the Rapid Miner Studio tool was used for data analysis according to age. To perform this analysis, the knowledge discovery in databases (KDD) methodology was used according to the stages that this methodology follows, such as data selection, data preparation, data mining and evaluation and interpretation. On the other hand, the comparison of methodologies such as the standard intersectoral process for data mining (Crips-dm), KDD and sample, explore, modify, model, evaluate (Semma) is shown, which is separated by dimensions and in each dimension both methodologies are compared. In that sense, a graph was created comparing algorithmic models such as naive Bayes, decision tree, and rule induction. It is concluded that the most outstanding result was -1.424 located in cluster 4 in the attribute result date.

Collaboration network of the authors

14 authors · 46 co-authorship links · 9 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades
  • Universidad Norbert Wiener
  • Universidad Continental
  • Universidad Tecnológica del Perú
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Pedro Molina-VelardeUniversidad Tecnológica del Perú6
Raúl Jáuregui-VelardeUniversidad Norbert Wiener2
Margarita Giraldo RetuertoUniversidad de Ciencias y Humanidades2
Janet Corzo-ZavaletaUniversidad de Ciencias y Humanidades1
Ada Alvarado-PaucarAffiliation unknown1
Cecilia Baldeón-VilcaAffiliation unknown1
Luis Segovia-FernándezAffiliation unknown1
Nelly Reyes-VilcaAffiliation unknown1
Giovana López-TolentinoAffiliation unknown1
Verónica Villarreal-ChumbesAffiliation unknown1
Jhon Canturín-NarreaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Data mining for predictive analysis in gynecology: a focus on cervical health</dc:title><dc:creator>Andrade-Arenas, Laberiano</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rubio-Paucar, Inoc</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yactayo-Arias, Cesar</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Currently, data mining based on the application of detection of important patterns that allow making decisions according to cervical cancer is a problem that affects women from the age of 24 years and older. For this purpose, the Rapid Miner Studio tool was used for data analysis according to age. To perform this analysis, the knowledge discovery in databases (KDD) methodology was used according to the stages that this methodology follows, such as data selection, data preparation, data mining and evaluation and interpretation. On the other hand, the comparison of methodologies such as the standard intersectoral process for data mining (Crips-dm), KDD and sample, explore, modify, model, evaluate (Semma) is shown, which is separated by dimensions and in each dimension both methodologies are compared. In that sense, a graph was created comparing algorithmic models such as naive Bayes, decision tree, and rule induction. It is concluded that the most outstanding result was -1.424 located in cluster 4 in the attribute result date.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-06-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i3.pp2822-2833</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v14i3.pp2822-2833</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 14 No 3 (2024); 2822</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/34678/17375</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>