Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Paradigma Konseling Dan Psikoterapi:Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Atas Landasan Teoretis,Pendekatan, Dan Teknik Intervensi

At-Taujih : Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 1–19

DOI
10.22373/3attq061
ISSN
2614-4980, 2598-585X
Terbit
2026-07-11
Penerbit
Prodi Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam Fakultas Dawah dan Komunikasi UIN Ar-Raniry
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Counseling and psychotherapy have developed into disciplines characterized by extraordinary paradigmatic diversity, yet comprehensive systematic reviews integrating recent theoretical developments across paradigms particularly from non-Western perspectives remain limited. Objective: This article aims to map and classify major counseling and psychotherapy paradigms, synthesize empirical evidence on therapeutic effectiveness and change mechanisms, and analyze the applicability of Western-developed frameworks in Indonesian and Southeast Asian contexts. Method: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted through structured searches across four databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar (January 2026). Boolean keyword strings combined terms for psychotherapy paradigms, therapeutic alliance, evidence-based practice, and multicultural competence. From 4,847 initial records, 49 articles met inclusion criteria following deduplication, independent screening (Cohen's κ = 0.84), and JBI Critical Appraisal (threshold ≥ 50%). Results: Three principal findings emerged: (1) eight major paradigms were identified and classified psychoanalytic/psychodynamic, humanistic-existential, cognitive-behavioral, contextual-behavioral, systemic-family, integrative/eclectic, multicultural-ecological, and neurobiological; (2) common therapeutic factors, particularly therapeutic alliance (r = 0.28–0.30), account for greater outcome variance than specific techniques; and (3) none of the 49 included studies originated from Indonesia, and only four from Asia, confirming a critical research gap. Conclusion: No single paradigm demonstrated universal superiority. The novelty of this review lies in explicitly connecting the WEIRD critique to Indonesian counseling education and proposing a culturally-adapted integrative framework as a priority for future empirical development in the region. Keywords: psychotherapy paradigms; therapeutic alliance; multicultural counseling; Indonesia; non-Western psychotherapy

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

11 penulis · 19 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ova EmiliaUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Devi RatnasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cindy MarisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hartono HartonoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Muhammad HakimiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Hartono HartonoSebelas Maret University1
Mohammad HakimiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/Taujih/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Paradigma Konseling Dan Psikoterapi:Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Atas Landasan Teoretis,Pendekatan, Dan Teknik Intervensi</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Donal, Donal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Karneli, Yeni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ardi, Zadrian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hariko, Rezki</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Counseling and psychotherapy have developed into disciplines characterized by extraordinary paradigmatic diversity, yet comprehensive systematic reviews integrating recent theoretical developments across paradigms particularly from non-Western perspectives remain limited. Objective: This article aims to map and classify major counseling and psychotherapy paradigms, synthesize empirical evidence on therapeutic effectiveness and change mechanisms, and analyze the applicability of Western-developed frameworks in Indonesian and Southeast Asian contexts. Method: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted through structured searches across four databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar (January 2026). Boolean keyword strings combined terms for psychotherapy paradigms, therapeutic alliance, evidence-based practice, and multicultural competence. From 4,847 initial records, 49 articles met inclusion criteria following deduplication, independent screening (Cohen's κ = 0.84), and JBI Critical Appraisal (threshold ≥ 50%). Results: Three principal findings emerged: (1) eight major paradigms were identified and classified psychoanalytic/psychodynamic, humanistic-existential, cognitive-behavioral, contextual-behavioral, systemic-family, integrative/eclectic, multicultural-ecological, and neurobiological; (2) common therapeutic factors, particularly therapeutic alliance (r = 0.28–0.30), account for greater outcome variance than specific techniques; and (3) none of the 49 included studies originated from Indonesia, and only four from Asia, confirming a critical research gap. Conclusion: No single paradigm demonstrated universal superiority. The novelty of this review lies in explicitly connecting the WEIRD critique to Indonesian counseling education and proposing a culturally-adapted integrative framework as a priority for future empirical development in the region.
Keywords: psychotherapy paradigms; therapeutic alliance; multicultural counseling; Indonesia; non-Western psychotherapy</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Prodi Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam  Fakultas Dawah dan Komunikasi  UIN Ar-Raniry</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-07-11</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/Taujih/article/view/34844</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/3attq061</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">At-Taujih : Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal At-Taujih; 1-19</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2614-4980</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-585X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/Taujih/article/view/34844/13218</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Donal Donal, Yeni Karneli, Zadrian Ardi, Rezki Hariko</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>