Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Efficient offloading and task scheduling in internet of thingth-cloud-fog environment

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4445-4455
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2024-08-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Efficient offloading and scientific task scheduling are crucial for managing computational tasks in research environments. This involves determining the optimal location for executing a workflow task and allocating the task to computing resources to optimize performance. The challenge is to minimize completion time, energy consumption, and cost. This study proposes three methods: latency-centric offloading (LCO) for delay-sensitive applications; energy-based offloading (EBO) for energy-saving; and efficient offloading (EO) for balanced task distribution across tiers. Scheduling in this paper uses a genetic algorithm (GA) with a weighted sum objective function considering makespan, cost, and energy for IoT-fog-cloud. Comparative studies involving Montage, Cybershake, and epigenomics workflows indicate that LCO excels in terms of makespan and cost but ranks the lowest in energy. EBO excels in energy efficiency, aligning closely with the base method. EO competes effectively with the base method in terms of makespan and cost but consumes more energy. This research enables the selection of the most suitable method based on the type of application and its prioritization of makespan, energy, or cost.

Collaboration network of the authors

4 authors · 6 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Suez Canal University
  • Port Said University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Efficient offloading and task scheduling in internet of thingth-cloud-fog environment</dc:title><dc:creator>Gamal, Marwa</dc:creator><dc:creator>Awad, Samar</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abdel-Kader, Rehab F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abd Elsalam , Khaled</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Efficient offloading and scientific task scheduling are crucial for managing computational tasks in research environments. This involves determining the optimal location for executing a workflow task and allocating the task to computing resources to optimize performance. The challenge is to minimize completion time, energy consumption, and cost. This study proposes three methods: latency-centric offloading (LCO) for delay-sensitive applications; energy-based offloading (EBO) for energy-saving; and efficient offloading (EO) for balanced task distribution across tiers. Scheduling in this paper uses a genetic algorithm (GA) with a weighted sum objective function considering makespan, cost, and energy for IoT-fog-cloud. Comparative studies involving Montage, Cybershake, and epigenomics workflows indicate that LCO excels in terms of makespan and cost but ranks the lowest in energy. EBO excels in energy efficiency, aligning closely with the base method. EO competes effectively with the base method in terms of makespan and cost but consumes more energy.&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;This research enables the selection of the most suitable method based on the type of application and its prioritization of makespan, energy, or cost.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-08-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4445-4455</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4445-4455</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 14 No 4 (2024); 4445</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/34760/17560</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>